[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Отв: Отв: Re: Stalin and Vygotsky



Then, bringing together Mike's and Helena's comments, let me say this:

If such experts in the field can not confirm the ban, I would say, without
aiming in any way to discharge Stalin and CPSU, that,

if the expression that "Vygotsky was banned in USSR" is so spread in he
West, in the capitalist world, hen I would question this  as an
ani-propaganda against Stalin, USSR and CPSU.

And I would add: Thus, so widespread crimes and faults of  these three seem
to be so inadequate that, imperialism feels itself obliged to add to these
crimes and faults.

I am not in anyway an ardent advocate of this mad violence in USSR under
Stalin (I believe it has objective and subjective causes) but I think tha I
would call this situation as an anti-communist inflation which needs a
deflation.

For instance, the Nazi lie that Katyn massacre belongs to Soviets was
disproved precisely  by Grover Furr.

*

As to theoretical deficiencies of Stalin, I agree completely.

Uneven development. Both the great evil and the advantage of humanity for
bounds.

Uneven because, neither Trotsky nor Stalin nor Buharin could replace Lenin
in terms of theoretical leadership. In fact, if the leadership of communist
movement is not a theoretician, there we have a disaster, I firmly believe.
Trostky, as Lenin said, was the most theoretical one, but  he was a
disaster politically.

I firmly believe that huge problems of communism are due to the fact that,
leadership could not be reproduced either individually or collectively, as
met by Vladimir İlyich.

It is a disaster that a party like CPSU could not find the best person to
take over in neither  in 1924 nor in 1953.

This is not excusable.

Only Cubans managed this but not theoretically but politically.



On 13 September 2017 at 18:27, Helena Sheehan <helena.sheehan@dcu.ie> wrote:

> Hi to you all.
>
> It's a long time since I conducted my research in this area.
>
> All academic disciplines in the USSR were characterised by lively debates
> about their theoretical foundations in the 1920s, but came under
> considerable pressure in the 1930s to come up with one position that would
> be the orthodox marxist position with sometimes dire consequences for the
> approaches cast aside.
>
> In the case of psychology, it spent the decade in disarray. Vygotsky was
> criticised at an official congress in 1930, which found all existing
> schools of soviet psychology inadequate to the tasks of socialist
> construction. I don't know if Vygotsky was actually banned though.
>
> Regards,
> Helena
>
> Professor Helena Sheehan
> Dublin City University
> Dublin 9 Ireland
> http://webpages.dcu.ie/~sheehanh/
>
> On 13 September 2017 at 14:39, Alexander Surmava <
> alexander.surmava@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Ulvi,
>> I rathe think that Stalin and his henchmen were infinitely far from any
>> serious theoretical culture. And the Stalinists were not Bolsheviks. They
>> were the executioners of the Bolsheviks.
>> There is a history of how Stalin, who guessed that his philosophical
>> education is very limping, asked Stan to read him a course of lectures on
>> the philosophy of Hegel, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
>> Stan__Jan_Ennestovich.
>> Alas ... These lectures ended sadly. For Stan. He was shot in 1937. And
>> sad for Marxist philosophy, too.
>> So even with a very great desire, Stalin could hardly have understood the
>> nuances that distinguished Vygotsky's theoretical views from the
>> theoretical views of Leontyev or Rubinstein.
>> Best wishes,
>> Sasha
>>
>>
>> среда, 13 сентября 2017 15:32 Ulvi İçil <ulvi.icil@gmail.com> писал(а):
>>
>>
>> I think Dr. Helena Sheehan's participation in this discussion can be
>> quite useful. She wrote on this issue in her excellent Marxism and
>> Philosophy of Science.
>>
>> Even if Stalin did not hear Vygotsky's name, there is he CPSU decree,
>> isn't it and Vytgotsky was the leading figure in this respect. So, it is
>> difficult that Stalin did not hear his name.
>>
>> I think Bolshevik leaders and statesmen were involved in such public
>> affairs and followed in detail, in art, in science even though from a
>> distance. This is bolshevik manner I believe.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 September 2017 at 14:31, Alexander Surmava <
>> alexander.surmava@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hardly had Stalin ever heard Vygotsky's name. And it is even less likely
>> that he could have any substantive claims to his theorizing. Most likely,
>> the secret cause of all the campaign directed against him was the desire of
>> some of the academic circles to curry favor with the authorities. The
>> formal reason for the campaign was that Vygotsky quoted Trotsky in his
>> works. . Trotsky's name was completely demonized by 1935. Trotsky for
>> Soviet propaganda was a kind of Devil in persona. Therefore, we should
>> rather be surprised if books with such virulent references were not
>> withdrawn from libraries, and their author was not banned.Accordingly,
>> attempts to look for genuine reasons for the persecution of Vygotsky's
>> books and ideas in the content part of his texts seem to me completely
>> ineffective.
>>
>>     понедельник, 11 сентября 2017 21:59 Shirley Franklin <
>> s.franklin08@btinternet.com> писал(а):
>>
>>
>>  Thanks everyone. Mike,  your experience and knowledge are really helpful.
>> I thought I had read at some point that his works were banned by Stalin,
>> who had a minder put onto Vygostky.  But I now see that the banning theory
>> has been revised.
>> See http://individual.utoronto.ca/ yasnitsky/texts/
>> presentationBarcelona-2016.pdf <http://individual.utoronto.
>> ca/yasnitsky/texts/ presentationBarcelona-2016. pdf>
>>
>> Shirley
>>
>> > On 11 Sep 2017, at 19:38, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ivan, Shirely, Leif et al ----
>> >
>> > The question of the ways in which Vygotsky's work was treated in the
>> USSR
>> > from the mid-1930's to the mid 1950's is the subject of dispute. There
>> was
>> > a special issue of the journal, Russian and East European Psychology (I
>> > forget the year, sorry) that translates a whole set of articles
>> denouncing
>> > Vygotksy and his followers. A recent book, Revisionist Revolution in
>> > Vygotsky Studies: The State of the Art
>> > <https://www.amazon.com/ Revisionist-Revolution-
>> Vygotsky-Studies-State/dp/ 1138887307/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&
>> ie=UTF8&qid=1505154601&sr=1-1& keywords=Vygotsky+revolution>
>> >
>> > you can find on Amazon and there are several published articles on the
>> > subject by the authors.
>> >
>> > I personally saw copies of Vyotsky's books with the front piece cut out
>> and
>> > I listened to the stories told in Moscow and (the Leningrad) in the
>> 1960's.
>> >
>> > His works were not banned in the sense that word is ordinarily used. But
>> > that his followers felt in an unusually vulnerable situation in a world
>> > that was horrendously dangerous to live in any, I have no doubt.
>> >
>> > But that's just my opinion.
>> >
>> > mike
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Leif Strandberg <
>> > leifstrandberg.ab@telia.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> A friend of mine who speaks Russian tells me that Vygotsky was
>> mentioned
>> >> in the Russian encyclopedia from the1940's.
>> >>
>> >> Leif
>> >> Sweden
>> >>
>> >> 11 sep 2017 kl. 10:58 skrev Shirley Franklin <
>> s.franklin08@btinternet.com
>> >>> :
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks for the ref, Ivan. I thought his books were banned. I also
>> >> thought that Stalin put a minder onto V.
>> >>> Shirley
>> >>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 09:50, Ivan Uemlianin <ivan@llaisdy.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dear Shirley
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I don't know if his work was actually banned, but Rudneva's 1936
>> paper
>> >> "Vygotsky’s Pedological Distortions" was part of the move against him.
>> >> There's a pdf in the list archives:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/ xmcamail.2011_06.dir/
>> pdfm7B5o5wrKB.pdf
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Best wishes
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ivan
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> festina lente
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 11 Sep 2017, at 09:36, Shirley Franklin <
>> >> s.franklin08@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> We read  how Stalin banned Vygotsky’s books, etc. What is the reason
>> >> for the ban?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Shirley Franklin
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> *Séanadh Ríomhphoist/Email DisclaimerTá an ríomhphost seo agus aon chomhad a sheoltar leis faoi rún agus is lena úsáid ag an seolaí agus sin amháin é. Is féidir tuilleadh a léamh anseo.  <https://www4.dcu.ie/iss/seanadh-riomhphoist.shtml>This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for use by the addressee. Read more here. <https://www4.dcu.ie/iss/email-disclaimer.shtml>*
>
>
>
> <https://www.facebook.com/DCU/> <https://twitter.com/DublinCityUni>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/dublin-city-university>
> <https://www.instagram.com/dublincityuniversity/?hl=en>
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/DublinCityUniversity>
>