[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Taxis and Embedding in Conversation



Hi,
I think the most extended meditation on being-with in recent years is that
by Jean-Luc Nancy. It is an integral part of *Being Singular Plural*, and
he also deals with it in an essay "The being-with of being there" in
the *Continental
Philosophy Review*, 2008.
Michael


Wolff-Michael Roth, Lansdowne Professor

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applied Cognitive Science
MacLaurin Building A567
University of Victoria
Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2
http://web.uvic.ca/~mroth <http://education2.uvic.ca/faculty/mroth/>

New book: *The Mathematics of Mathematics
<https://www.sensepublishers.com/catalogs/bookseries/new-directions-in-mathematics-and-science-education/the-mathematics-of-mathematics/>*

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Martin John Packer <mpacker@uniandes.edu.co>
wrote:

> Larry,
>
> The principal exploration of mitsein (being-with) that I know of is with
> regard to therapy. Existential therapy in particular, for example…
>
> <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00071773.2005.11006556>
>
> Martin
>
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Lplarry <lpscholar2@gmail.com<mailto:l
> pscholar2@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Martin,
> Thanks for this clarification.
> So mitsein is a particular mode of being- there in the here-and-now
> situation.
> mitsein being  a mode that (could be) in the realm of possibility in the
> here and now situation.
> Does this mode of mitsein express an affinity with James Ma’s focus on
> intellectual virtues?
> The focus on higher academic teaching and learning as a process of
> cultivation of the mode of mitsein as a could be possible dasein?
> In contrast to the dominant mode of instrumental mastery
>
>
> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>
> From: Martin John Packer
> Sent: July 5, 2017 2:57 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Taxis and Embedding in Conversation
>
> Larry,
>
> Dasein is usually unpacked as ‘Being-there,’ and it is said that
> Heidegger’s point was that humans understand themselves, and one another,
> in terms of their situatedness. In the here-&-now, not in the entire
> cosmos!  :)
>
> There is a discussion of mitsein in Being & Time, too. But Gadamer
> certainly gave it more emphasis than Heidegger did. Mitsein, for Heidegger,
> is a mode or aspect of Dasein. It is a way in which Dasein (human being)
> can be.
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 3:53 PM, Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com<mailto:l
> pscholar2@gmail.com><mailto:lpscholar2@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Less a protesting intent than da-sein [being-THAT] . Gadamer
> points out that Heiddeger's focus on da-sein pervades his project and that
> Gadamer intende to shift towards the centrality of mit-sein
>
>
>
>