[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie
- From: HENRY SHONERD <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:11:19 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=gH1CgEfRO/ipzgIAuoF9mqNRHhqm1UvzU4ojZrYt2gs=; b=iGxSXasD7DRM0fznlBa+sshqth5NXzD/Rt+iVbXmHr1WE8ttVb2jEcKttouH0AcOGx RGs8fcmGSw2rijZ9TONYbIdgfi6xvxrh24OJXhqLeKRL7GMwICAKTOkrHhmFhkr6qKJC Kc87ozZy/vxjvuh0B4xgmWKpod7dP1NZw9M1BZOsFTjTw7t3BSHwT29U+deXZGU5qvgX z6iv1ovGbozAdfnH+Ei8zr0AymL+0uRSpxM5DpGZ8lsZuxiqWstPaDoZhH6d7vaoX7ku KnOPzbDKJ3AK/BpOy8YgMKHsNx8DuYvpsIGLGCZ0nIDXnia+CTVYUMDMMyuTjp5DnfMM REtA==
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CA00C46C-4CDF-4808-8CE7-56075F2C88F2@uniandes.edu.co> <email@example.com> <CAHCnM0Df5_WpjahrD-806V4aSyRM9siKP1QKaT4qQqPe2ZpkRg@mail.gmail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Peg and all,
At first I thought this was a feel-good moment from something Sophie Cruz had memorized…I couldn’t believe she is that articulate. I asked my wife if she had heard about Sophie Cruz and if she could possible measure up to her performance in Washington in a conversation, a dialog. My wife told me that an interview on Democracy now confirmed her “gift of gab” at six years old. Amazing. Reminds me of the song “Teach Your Children Well”: teach your children well lyrics <https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=teach+your+children+well+lyrics&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8> and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teach_Your_Children <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teach_Your_Children>.
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Peg Griffin <Peg.Griffin@att.net> wrote:
> Maybe young Sophie Cruz provides information relevant to these age differences: "I also want to tell the children not to be afraid because we are not alone. There are still many people that have their hearts filled with love and tenderness to snuggle in this path of life. Let's keep together and fight for their rights! God is with us!"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of mike cole
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 6:54 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie
> Martin's caution relates to my suggestion that we not restrict the same to our families or students and friends. People experienced the Trump victory in different ways. The example from LSV involves kids of three ages. That still seems an important focus. Our contemporaries are in there 30's + (and
> ++). Our students are in latest teens or 20+. High school kids are in
> teens. Middle school kids.....
> It is my strong impression that there are significant age differences in ones experience of the event that could be elicited pretty easily and compared in the group across other interesting categories of difference such as nationality.
> A small, positive, collective effort?
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <email@example.com>
>> Dear Martin,
>> thanks for the nuances you introduce. Yes, I agree with you, it is
>> totally sensible to hear Trump's words with hope and actually
>> (perezhivat) them in such a way as to become moving force towards
>> transformation. I was only approaching the speech from a developmental
>> stages perspective, where, to hear the speech with contempt given the
>> speech's formal structure as a type of generalisation, would mean to
>> hear them within that stage that Andy very appropriately (in my view)
>> called as "magic". Vygotsky (I think) also used this term to refer to
>> a stage in child development.
>> But I do not wish to say that contempt is the only possible quality,
>> and so, as you very nicely remark, hope, enthusiasm, empowerment, all
>> these and their developmental and historical conditions should be
>> considered as possibilities of hearing Trump's speech.
>> Thanks a lot for the resources/links, I am incorporating them to our
>> joint document.
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> <email@example.com> on behalf of Martin John Packer
>> Sent: 22 January 2017 16:08
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Trump's speech and Perezhivanie
>> Hi Alfredo.
>> I think your proposal is very interesting; that we could explore two
>> different ways of hearing and understanding Trump’s words. But if I
>> understand you correctly, I don’t agree that “in the first case, there
>> is no hope for change, there is contempt.” I have lived in Michigan
>> and Pennsylvania, and in both states industries that were central to
>> the economic rise of the working class, auto manufacturing and steel
>> foundries, collapsed as a result of globalization. I have seen first
>> hand some of the communities that were almost completely destroyed. I
>> believe that people who experienced these changes do hear Trump’s
>> words with hope for change, and if they have contempt it is for
>> professional politicians who they feel speak but do not act.
>> But perhaps you mean it was a lack of hope that *led* people to Trump:
>> The New Yorker has published several articles by George Packer (no
>> relation) on the appeal that Trump has to the white working class. For
>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 3:44 PM, Alfredo Jornet Gil <email@example.com
>> <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
>> Dear Helena, Andy, all,
>> Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the time to watch the
>> movie Fate of a Man, but I have followed the very interesting analyses
>> and conversations about it. I am opening this thread as connexions
>> between those analyses, perezhivanie, and current tragic social and
>> political situation in the US and elsewhere. This also connects with
>> the article that Mike shared on the position of the Learning Sciences
>> with regard to this situation (how happy I was to see this initiative!).
>> In particular, I wanted to pick up on Helena's very true comment that
>> "the US is going to have to produce some works of scholarship or art,
>> or both, that attempt to explain what is happening now here in the US
>> -- for example, this afternoon, under President Trump."
>> Yesterday, we saw at home Trump's speech. Although we had followed
>> Trump's campaign and its denigrating tenor, it was yesterday, for the
>> first time, that my wife and me got this gut feeling of true tragedy,
>> of a real *drama* as we heard those empty, but to recover the prior
>> article for discussion, hollowed and hollowing words coming out of
>> that mouth. It came upon us that there may be lots of people for whom
>> those words are not hollowed, but actually encouraging, rich, beautiful. How can you hear that as beauty?
>> So, I was wondering, and in following up with our 2016 MCA Issue 4
>> discussion, whether we could not actually conduct an analysis of the
>> sort Marc offers in his article of the perezhivanie. Just as Vygotsky
>> explains how 3 different children experience the situation of an
>> alcoholic mother differently, could not we perform an analysis ?of
>> that perezhivanie in which a person experiences yesterday's situation
>> as one of encouragement, of freedom and hope. Would that not be a way
>> to try to understand what is going on? This would not be a piece of
>> art, but could be something we could do to try to understand and change this situation.
>> We could then contrast that perezhivanie with the one many of as have,
>> in which the situation is experience as a real TRAGEDY. I think in the
>> first case, there is no hope for change, there is contempt; in the
>> second, hearing those words as hollowed and hollowing require that you
>> live the situation as a doubled situation in which you experienced it
>> from a very different developmental stage. One in which the speech
>> sounds as a case of involution.
>> Should we find the transcribed speech and perform such analysis?
>> Going now to support the Woman's march here in Victoria BC.