[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: PDF Document Sociocultural and Feminist Theory_ Mutuality and Relevance.pdf
At AERA a few weeks back I saw a panel with Jacob McWilliams on it that was
dealing with these very issues that you mention here Mike as you quote and
"hear here" Phillip's comments.
The talks on the panel that Jacob was on were, as I understand it, chapters
of an upcoming book that will be edited by Angela Booker and ???. I fear
I've forgotten some of the details but I do remember the panel being one of
the best panels I attended at AERA this year.
Jacob, or perhaps someone else familiar with the book: could you fill in
the details here? Who is the co-editor (or co-editors)? What is the name of
Any other details would be greatly appreciated (anticipated publication
date? Perhaps a list of authors if it isn't too premature).
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:23 PM, mike cole <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hear hear, Phillip!
> Who wrote:
> i read this conclusion as a call for those scholars studying mind, culture
> and activity to actively collaborate with critical theorists, critical race
> theorist, queer theorists, so that, as Helena Worthem is advocating, our
> work can be closer to the bone of contemporary events.
> The editors of MCA, I think it is safe to say, will welcome first class
> articles that do exactly this.
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 3:01 PM, White, Phillip <
> > greetings, everyone. i can only image that the participants of xmca have
> > been waiting with baited breath to hear the results of my gefilte fish
> > last friday's seder - and i can only repeat, so that you know that i'm
> > fishing for compliments, that the gentleman in his late seventies who was
> > seated next to me (my son's mother-in-law's cousin's husband) said, "This
> > gefilte fish is better than my Kiev born grandmother, and she was a great
> > cook!"
> > however, to join in the swim or current postings, Vera's conclusion is
> > quite to the point, so that i'm pasting it in here:
> > "In the beginning of this chapter, I suggested that traditional
> > psychological and economic
> > models of human agents as lone, competitive actors are losing influence.
> > Increasingly, interdependence between persons is recognized as central to
> > individual and societal functioning. Both cultural-historical and
> > theorists place the social sources of development, or "self-in-re1ation"
> > central within their framework. There are shared themes and
> > complementarity, as well as different emphases across these two groups of
> > theorists. Feminists' concerns with developmental and relational dynamics
> > are not explicitly shared by scholars studying mind, culture and
> > However, in looking for areas of mutuality , we broaden our ways of
> > knowing, and, in the process, may construct a new synthesis between
> > and motive, and cognition and emotion."
> > i read this conclusion as a call for those scholars studying mind,
> > and activity to actively collaborate with critical theorists, critical
> > theorist, queer theorists, so that, as Helena Worthem is advocating, our
> > work can be closer to the bone of contemporary events.
> > phillip
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
> that creates history. Ernst Boesch
Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
Department of Anthropology
880 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602