[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion



https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/stewart.htm
This is the Introduction to "Hegel Myths and Legends."
Unfortunately, Stewart propagates a couple of Marx myths and legends in the process of compiling a passably good expose of Hegel myths and legends.
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://home.mira.net/~andy
http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
On 25/04/2016 1:54 AM, Lplarry wrote:

Andy,

Is there no merit then in this notion of abstraction as a moment that may potentially become concretely actualized or realized ?

Andy is there an article that can unfold how this myth historically developed?

My growing edge.

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

*From: *Andy Blunden <mailto:ablunden@mira.net>
*Sent: *April 24, 2016 8:31 AM
*To: *xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca-l@mailman.ucsd.edu>
*Subject: *[Xmca-l] Re: Question on an abstract notion

That Hegel used "Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis" is a myth, Larry.

Andy

------------------------------------------------------------

Andy Blunden

http://home.mira.net/~andy

http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making

On 25/04/2016 1:06 AM, Lplarry wrote:

> Hegel begins with a high abstraction as a thesis statement. Then moves to antithesis, arriving at a more *concrete* synthesis. This as the movement towards form and structure and order.

>

> If this is accurate then I want to begin here with a high abstraction.

>

> Being is not self-identity but rather self-differentiation. The opposite of being (thesis) is not non-being or negation, but rather the *absence* of negation (uniformity or indifference).

>

> I will pause here, at this height of high abstraction as a speculation without grounding. Does this abstraction have any merit?

> If this notion/speculation as high abstraction does have any potency, this abstraction will need to *travel* towards *concrete* actualization and realization as a movement of *becoming* (movement of synthesis).

>

> First my inquiry concerning this high abstracted question exploring the notion of being &*absence* of being (uniformity) as *indifference*.

> Living experience (as) asymmetrical (not symmetrical uniformity).

> Therefore the need for *modulation* within living experience.

>

>

>

> Sent from my Windows 10 phone

>

>