[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Collective decisions
- To: Andy Blunden <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Collective decisions
- From: Lplarry <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:15:32 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:mime-version:to:from:subject:date:importance:in-reply-to :references; bh=vh3UqU7FymW1FjWsHgNVEiBCxR84eDQCud62DoeJ3yU=; b=XEjsvmLuhxfMqhFBmsO94R/59xfNd5BWGA6Ex8xSDyMKA15CN4Xsg4lAPBzMz/i7io 70sdftxy3U0oHJFgzv7SteMlZBL0Jzmuf9qw0K3nfHo1c3nCSWEGeSLDjPYG0Anbccl2 AFO8ONn+mHkP6NgIJJ1dHrZj7WJvgEfn3YrqPsZCqNT+zhNPCGgtDpRRtrDDTXi1e01v vhd2lFuatM27hMoc6moSr2U94en8fEpFXPXF7YWMUW5j4ZcDmT2BNlTOUM8eq3NQcyji 9tmSADTorlC1BTUP9ZhLF4vCAzf9cjx6e9dMP4eCm3rNtzYNmCqWnuD98VS/GBaJ+UzT cXVg==
- In-reply-to: <571AE2AF.email@example.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <571AE2AF.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
This book that germinated in your observation that differing notions of what is the preferred way of participating in collective mutual collaboration was fragmenting collective forms into factions.
This question *why* which led to this book is a profound question.
It overlaps significantly with the monologue/ monologue theme.
As I read the synopsis your adding *counsel* as a third way was interesting.
One impression as I was reading was how significant *intermediate* community (between family and state) was historically to generating all three developmental *forms* of con/sensus.
The notion of collaboration which includes:
The prefix *con* with *sensus* has a tone which resonates both with this thread and the other thread.
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: Andy Blunden
Sent: April 22, 2016 7:51 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Collective decisions
Not unrelated to the theme of collaboration, I would like to
share the news of the publication of my book, "The Origins
of Collective Decision Making," which takes an historical
perspective on the topic, stretching back more than 1,000 years.
I have attached a synopsis for your interest.
Home Page <http://home.mira.net/%7Eandy/>
Origins of Collective Decision Making