[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: 4 experiencing fans



Mike,
I  access the 2nd article by Vasilyuk but I am curious that there is a
silence concerning the focus on suffering and where experience ends prayer
begins.  This place of mystery after the suffering of having *fallen away
from ... [and] now returning to the source.  Hamlet and Ophelia AS symbolic
incarnations of the *mythic* narrative.
THIS neo-Platonic mytheme which streams through Western ways of
*addressing* suffering through SILENCE.
In the beginning is the word is better understood as *in the beginning was
the 1st order word*.
The article by Kym Maclaren on this 1st order word which has its genesis in
silence [the gap or *ma*].
The KEY is *prayer* as answer to suffering. THIS is the *open space* of
silence. The open space of the 1st order word which is being born in this
*situation* The 1st order word is INHERENT within this situation [this
space of play].

I suggest we take Vasilyuk AT *his word* and *hear* what he is saying here.

Why the *silence*??

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:48 PM, mike cole <mcole@ucsd.edu> wrote:

> Those interested in the later work of Feodor Vasiliuk on
> perezhivanie/experiencing, here is new material free.
>
> http://www.tandfonline.com/author/Vasilyuk%2C+F
>
> mike
>
>
>
> --
>
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an
> object that creates history. Ernst Boesch
>