[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: G. H. Mead and Harvey Sacks
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: G. H. Mead and Harvey Sacks
- From: "Glassman, Michael" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:34:02 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 188.8.131.52) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; mailman.ucsd.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
- By2ffo11hub035: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
- In-reply-to: <CAHH++P=eQWebMQQaMfQFSRgFgPmXLJKbhreZogYbyhx5THMovg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHH++P=eQWebMQQaMfQFSRgFgPmXLJKbhreZogYbyhx5THMovg@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Thread-index: AQHQvX+HIgw6AI9Cyk6YhGe5MdG5JZ3ZheSw
- Thread-topic: [Xmca-l] G. H. Mead and Harvey Sacks
Taking a first look at the article there is something that, I am really confused about, maybe others can help clear up this mystery. Almost all the work cited in the article comes from the book Mind, Self and Society - which was published posthumously by his students. I was also told in graduate school Mead didn't publish very much on its own. Yet a few years ago I went to a Mead archive (it is no longer open, I wish I could remember the link, it is actually back somewhere in the xmca archive - search Mead if you are interested) which included a number of articles including contemporaneous reviews and rejoinders. I read a few of them and they were really, really good - and I got a much better understanding of what Blumer came to call symbolic interactionism.
I would also argue against the author's interpretation of Mead. In the end he was an instrumental Pragmatist and was focused on process.
Anyway, anybody who has insight please let me know.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Greg Thompson
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 11:20 AM
Subject: [Xmca-l] G. H. Mead and Harvey Sacks
Interesting article by George Psathas about G. H. Mead and Harvey Sacks if anyone is interested:
Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
Department of Anthropology
880 Spencer W. Kimball Tower
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602