[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: FW: NYTimes: If an Algorithm Wrote This, How Would You Even Know?
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: FW: NYTimes: If an Algorithm Wrote This, How Would You Even Know?
- From: mike cole <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 16:18:08 -0700
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <7D27E386-9CBE-4B06-B7D5-B2ADACB149C3@uga.edu> <CO1PR02MB1750BC58A4F008696B0E618A41A0@CO1PR02MB175.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Could you folks who are discussing possible infrastructural improvements in
xmca please create a thread called xmca infrastructural improvements, or
whatever? The discussion is bleeding across headers and making difficult to
track discussion threads, fragile as those
tendrils tend to be.
Trying to keep track on so cal
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Annalisa Aguilar <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> This is an intriguing article. Thanks for posting it. I think it passed
> the Turing test for me, because I thought the first example was written by
> a person because it didn't have that much data, and the other example had
> too much data, but then I was comparing them, so it's not a clean Turing
> I would like to clarify to the esteemed others on our beloved list that a
> feed is an automated script (which would live at XMCA server) that would
> ping other sites (like the way a radar works) and capture links from these
> offsite websites. These links (and perhaps a truncated blurb of text) would
> display on the xmca homepage, with the idea that there would be no need to
> control permissions on the server once the feed script was set up.
> At least that's the idea, it may be more complex than that (Huw??), but it
> is worth exploring because it means that any XMCA author could be in charge
> of one's own content, as a blog or any other digital content offsite from
> XMCA and the links would appear (ideally) at the XMCA homepage, making it a
> kind of clearinghouse for current events in the community in terms of other
> published content appearing on the web.
> Of course we might want to remember that this will likely generate more
> discussion in the wider community, which would be a good thing, but have we
> the server horsepower? Just asking...
> If any one is on Academia, this is happening when you get notifications
> that Andy has uploaded a new draft of a paper, for example (if one is
> following him there obviously. Andy has not become that ubiquitous just
> yet!!!) So instead of this feed appearing as an email (though it could do
> that), it appears as a list or stream at the XMCA website.
> Another thought: There is the possibility of creating filters and tags and
> this would enable the feed to create topical pages that list links there so
> that one isn't seeing a flood of unsorted links, but that they are grouped
> based upon their tags/filters.
> Of course this isn't computer generated text as is described in the NYT
> article, but I realized that non-technical folks may not understand what a
> feed is. So I thought I'd try explaining that.
> Anyone, please feel free to add to what I've said, I don't mind.
> Kind regards,
It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
that creates history. Ernst Boesch.