[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Fwd: Little Evidence That Executive Function Interventions Boost Student Achievement
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Fwd: Little Evidence That Executive Function Interventions Boost Student Achievement
- From: larry smolucha <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:35:22 -0600
- In-reply-to: <CAHCnM0DdCwYMx98LJmNCU=a_ExMYgO81wPJSwMk9unwbMHC91g@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <email@example.com>, <CAHCnM0DdCwYMx98LJmNCU=a_ExMYgO81wPJSwMk9unwbMHC91g@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: <email@example.com>
Message from Francine:
Thanks for posting this review article. I gave ita quick read. Here's my critique of it:
1) The correlational data is strong, but proof of cause and effect is weak
for outcomes measures based on standardized tests for 'normal' populations.
2) The review did not included studies of children diagnosed with attention deficit disorders.
3) A major research project in Britain was not included.
If we accept these findings what we know is that there is no evidence that developing
executive functions improves 'normal' children's scores on standardized achievement tests .
>From what I saw the achievement tests used where the type known to correlate with IQ -
card sorting, digits forward and backward. The conclusions specifically stated that the review
did not look at outcome measures such as academic grades, truancy, etc.
The review did not look at literacy in particular, which is the focus of many programs
to develop executive functions. Excluding children diagnosed with attention deficit
disorders excludes an extremely important population, where the strongest gains
would be expected.
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:19:41 -0800
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Fwd: Little Evidence That Executive Function Interventions Boost Student Achievement
> Given the la la la about such interventions, journals on brain and
> education, etc., this is kind of interesting.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: AERA Communications <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:00 AM
> Subject: Little Evidence That Executive Function Interventions Boost
> Student Achievement
> To: email@example.com
> * For Immediate Release:*
> March 5, 2015
> Tony Pals, firstname.lastname@example.org
> office: (202) 238-3235
> cell: (202) 288-9333
> Bridget Jameson, email@example.com
> office: (202) 238-3233
> *Study: Little Evidence That Executive Function Interventions Boost Student
> *WASHINGTON, D.C., March 5, 2015—*Despite growing enthusiasm among
> educators and scholars about the potential of school-based executive
> function interventions to significantly increase student achievement, a
> federally funded meta-analysis of 25 years’ worth of research finds no
> conclusive evidence that developing students’ executive function skills
> leads to better academic performance, according to a new study published
> today in *Review of Educational Research*, a peer-reviewed journal of the
> American Educational Research Association.
> - VIDEO: Co-author Robin Jacob discusses key findings.
> The meta-analysis
> by researchers Robin Jacob of the University of Michigan and Julia
> Parkinson of the American Institutes for Research, analyzed 67 studies
> published over the past 25 years on the link between executive function and
> achievement. The authors critically assessed whether improvements in
> executive function skills—the skills related to thoughtful planning, use of
> memory and attention, and ability to control impulses and resist
> distractions—lead to increases in reading and math achievement, as measured
> by standardized test scores, among school-age children from preschool
> through high school. More than half of the studies identified by the
> authors were published after 2010, reflecting the rapid increase in
> interest in the topic in recent years.
> While the authors found that previous research indicated a strong
> correlation between executive function and achievement, they found
> “surprisingly little evidence” that the two are causally related.
> “There’s a lot of evidence that executive function and achievement are
> highly correlated with one another, but there is not yet a resounding body
> of evidence that indicates that if you changed executive functioning skills
> by intervening in schools, that it would then lead to an improvement in
> achievement in children,” said Jacob. “Although investing in executive
> function interventions has strong intuitive appeal, we should be wary of
> investing in these often expensive programs before we have a strong
> research base behind them.”
> “Studies that explore the link between executive function and achievement
> abound, but what is striking about the body of research is how few attempts
> have been made to conduct rigorous analyses that would support a causal
> relationship,” said Jacob.
> The authors note that few studies have controlled for characteristics such
> as parental education, socioeconomic status, or IQ, although these
> characteristics have been found to be associated with the development of
> executive function. They found that even fewer studies have attempted
> randomized trials to rigorously assess the impact of interventions.
> “Although the link between the two may well be causal, the link needs to be
> clearly established before programs designed to improve executive function
> in school-age children are taken to scale,” said Jacob.
> The meta-analysis provided several findings on the correlation between
> executive function and academic function:
> - The correlation is highly consistent whether measured at a single
> point in time or as a predictor of future achievement.
> - The correlation is approximately the same for different age
> groups—three-to-five year olds, six-to-11 year olds, and 12-to-18 year olds.
> - The correlation is about the same for achievement in both reading and
> math, countering the common assumption that executive function is more
> closely associated with success in math.
> - The correlation is consistent across subcomponents of executive
> function (inhibition, attention control, attention shifting, and working
> This research was supported by a grant from the Institute of Education
> Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education.
> *About AERA*
> *The **American Educational Research Association (AERA)
> the largest national professional organization devoted to the scientific
> study of education. Founded in 1916, AERA advances knowledge about
> education, encourages scholarly inquiry related to education, and promotes
> the use of research to improve education and serve the public good. Find
> AERA on **Facebook
> This release is available online.
> This email was sent to firstname.lastname@example.org. You are receiving this email
> because of your association with AERA. Click the following link to change
> your preference or opt out of AERA emails: preferences
> American Educational Research Association
> 1430 K Street, NW, Suite 1200
> Washington, DC 20005
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
> that creates history. Ernst Boesch.