[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Unreading Althusser
Thank you very much! I would be interested.
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Glassman, Michael <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> The student couldn't do videos even though that was her original intent because of IRB problems (it is based on a PAR study using videos in a small Canadian town). So she just developed a performance troupe. I don't feel comfortable putting up her work without her permission but if anybody is interested I can give you some information off-line.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of mike cole
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 12:10 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Unreading Althusser
> Hi Michael --- Glad my earlier query concerning "video gallery"
> facilities finally made sense.
> Would it be possible to see your student's video? Is it on Youtube?
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Glassman, Michael <email@example.com>
>> Hi Annalise,
>> I am not sure I understand your correlation between the video programs
>> and kitsch. It seems to me Morten Nissen is critiquing the
>> establishment view of the videos on a number of levels, while still
>> trying to suggest that they are a better method than the more
>> individualistic, traditional therapies of motivational interviewing
>> and cognitive behavioral therapy. I can really sympathize, having
>> spent a number of years on a research project comparing motivational
>> interviewing, CBT and treatment as usual (spoiler alert, neither of
>> the interventions have any real impact). And yet that is all we do.
>> U-turn suggests a new method, except at least it seems to me Nissen
>> fears it falling into similar traps. One of the traps is treating the
>> video as an object that forces reconsideration of the user's - in this
>> case Birren - life structure leading to drug addiction - at least I
>> think that is what Nissen is saying. That the video becomes something
>> controlled by the therapy community rather than integrated into the
>> larger life scheme of the user. But I see this as a really complex
>> argument. Yes, the way that Nissen describes this - as an advanced
>> form of video story telling with trained videographers it does easily
>> become an object rather than part of the processes of life. Whose
>> video is it, the user's, the videographer's, the therapist's, the
>> social work community establishment. But I think much of this has to
>> do with understanding the role of this type of video storytelling,
>> which is more about the community, what Nissen I think refers to as
>> the collective than the individual (I think this point is kind of made at the end of the article).
>> But what if it could be a different type of video, made from start to
>> finish by Birren and other users. Mike's earlier request for programs
>> where individuals can easily make videos makes much more sense. A
>> student working on our research project did her dissertation within a
>> participatory action research format in which she organized the
>> homeless youth/users (the study was about addiction among homeless youth) into a performance truth.
>> She also was looking to create the performance as an object that would
>> lead to reflection on the structure of their lives, but I think in a
>> much more grass roots, genuine way.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:
>> email@example.com] On Behalf Of Annalisa Aguilar
>> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 2:42 AM
>> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
>> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Unreading Althusser
>> Hello esteemed xmcars,
>> I have done a quick reading of Morten Nissen's chapter and I would
>> like to proffer that what he describes with the video production as a
>> form of therapy for the drug addict (as sponsored by state programs),
>> does resemble to me the very kind of interactions that happened to
>> create the Kitsch in Art and how it came to be that Kitsch is the
>> favorite art of dictators (see my previous post in this thread, in
>> particularly I suggest in this context the essay by Greenberg as well as the WSJ article).
>> It is as if what is considered hopeful (helpful), what is considered
>> therapeutic(empowering), which is done to transcend the past and the
>> future by being in the present, all that is erased by collapsing what
>> is meaningful into a formula of the unique or of sentiment (in this
>> case, hope), a kind of Möbius strip of experience as possibility,
>> which ends up becoming meaningless. Is the glass half full or half empty?
>> I'm being a more than a little intuitive here, knowing that I may not
>> be walking on terra firma, which may not be very smart as I risk the
>> concrete blocks of "dogma" crashing around my head: It is easy to
>> label the original as dogma if one has adopted the stance of kitsch, I am realizing.
>> Despite that risk, I sense similar patterns to Nissen's paper and
>> notions of kitsch (and how kitsch is created), and while I'm unsure at
>> this point of time if this observation has merit, I offer it for
>> discussion with the best of intentions.
>> Kind regards,
> It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object that creates history. Ernst Boesch.