[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Unreading Althusser
I fear i cannot do as you ask, Annalisa. My plate overfloweth and leaveth
garbage around as it is. Perhaps others are in a position to elaborate or
perhaps I was just being obscure. I think its an important topic.
This might be one of the places where some curating would help. A lot of
that discussion is in the MCA archive . Important documents include Andy's
defense of Vygotsky available on Academic .edu and probably in the XMCA
mail archive and Morten Nissen's article in Andy's book on projects that I
sent around recently but seems to have landed under eveyone's radar but
Greg's. Morten specifically points out this problem in the writings of
Scandanvian/Nordic activity theorists. Pulling that all together could be
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Annalisa Aguilar <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Would you kindly say more about "the neat tool for organizing all sorts of
> activities for 'upbringing' the young"?
> Would you expand upon that concept? It does seem ironic, and I would
> appreciate to understand how Stalinist affordances could actually be useful
> in today's age.
> I am greatly provoked by such a concept, and that's why I ask. Please help
> me understand this!!!
> Kind regards,
It is the dilemma of psychology to deal as a natural science with an object
that creates history. Ernst Boesch.