[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: What is a Pedagogy of the Oppressors?
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: What is a Pedagogy of the Oppressors?
- From: Andy Blunden <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:01:31 +1100
- In-reply-to: <C8B3CE14-E938-4ABC-BC06-03B3CA933373@gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAF8DDy8VqGOh_P+iT9Ck5=rRwHo0iMnmTx0Z0DhV_iCtRK6tug@mail.gmail.com> <CAHH++PnCOMyT8MqjZOT_riHgEY58D87PKXtzwWcJ3YyE5NELJQ@mail.gmail.com> <000001d028b0$aef9b560$0ced2020$@edu>, <CAHH++Pn6jxpSkvW=Db-QTBSwYzH46c8w+xENQ+xbP6TX2Jp4Mg@mail.gmail.com> <3B91542B0D4F274D871B38AA48E991F9087579@CIO-TNC-D2MBX01.osuad.osu.edu> <C8B3CE14-E938-4ABC-BC06-03B3CA933373@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: <email@example.com>, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: <email@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (Windows/20090812)
I hesitate to intervene in this conversation, which is quintessentially,
though by no means exclusively, American. But the subject heading "What
is a Pedagogy of the Oppressors?" recalls for me Myles Horton's remarks,
in his conversation with Paulo Freire:
"I use the term /education/ in contrast to schooling. I decided
before Highlander was started that I wanted to work with adults, and
the reasons were that in growing up, commencement speakers always
made the same speech that young people are the future leaders of
this country. It's up to young people to make this a decent country
and solve these problems. And I discovered what everybody else
discovered, that they never had any intention of letting the people
they were talking to do anything about society. It's a kind of
pacification speech. The adults run society. Students don't run
society. They have very little say within the schools let alone
society, the larger society. So I decided I wanted to deal with the
people who had the power, if they wanted to use it, to change
society, because I was interested in changing society." (p. 182-3)
Freire and Horton educated the young, politically active adults in the
oppressed section of their respective societies, who went on to build
social movements and change society, though it appears that the job is
far from finished. I make these points, particularly to the educators on
xmca, in the spirit of Marx's "Theses in Feuerbach" #3:
"The materialist doctrine that men are products of circumstances and
upbringing, and that, therefore, changed men are products of changed
circumstances and changed upbringing, forgets that it is men who
change circumstances and that the educator must himself be educated.
Hence this doctrine is bound to divide society into two parts, one
of which is superior to society. The coincidence of the changing of
circumstances and of human activity or self-change can be conceived
and rationally understood only as **revolutionary practice**."
PS. Saw a great movie on this recently: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0375679/
Helena Worthen wrote:
This discussion of an opposition between individualism and collectivism sounds like something out of the 1950s, when "individuals" were viewed as heroic if they stood up to "conformity."
The demonstrations in Ferguson could just as well be seen as evidence of a collective resistance to oppression, not individualism.
Labor law provides for collective action because the power relationships of the workplace are so unequal that unless people work together to protect themselves, they are helpless. The language in which this right is named is as follows: "Concerted activity for mutual aid and protection." This language goes back to the earliest labor legislation in the US, the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932. It simply means that if you are doing something alone, by yourself, as an individual, to better yourself, you are unprotected and your employer can retaliate against you. If you are doing something with other people -- which means that you have done the work of talking with them and you agree about what you're doing -- then your employer cannot retaliate against you for doing it.
This is the most basic, bottom-level piece of labor law in the US. Every time someone at work speaks out against something dangerous or cruel or insulting, and does it with other people -- not as a lone individual, but as part of a group, which would include their union but doesn't have to -- they are invoking this right.
That's a completely different view of "collectivism" than what people have been bringing up on this list. When I look at YouTube videos (or on Vice) to see the young people moving around on the streets in Ferguson, I see concerted activity. Same here in Berkeley, where there have been numerous demonstrations including blocking I-80. I am glad they're doing it and I respect them for it.
Various labor commentators, by the way, have excoriated the police union for their behavior toward Mayor DeBlasio and other old NY unions for their failure to speak out against police killings of unarmed black men.