[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Sociocritical Literacies and more context
Manuel! My apologies for referring to you as Miguel. Got twisted in the
thread. Hope the comments/question on testimonio made more sense.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Espinoza, Manuel <
> Hello everyone,
> Hope this note finds you all well. Just adding to the conversation on
> literacies, social dreaming, the Migrant Program at UCLA (I was one of many
> that served the students during the early 2000s) and testimonio.
> The idea of testimonio as an aspect of the "concrete" is cool. To my
> mind, within that realm of really rich Soviet/Russian thinking, testimonio
> can be thought of as one way that human beings remake social life guided
> by intellect and heart. (Think of what testimonio accomplished in the
> context of 1980s Central America or mid-1990s South Africa.) But the idea
> of testimonio as an aspect of the "abstract" seems right on as well.
> Testimonio is also meaningful and comprehensive thought that explains
> reality better than what we had before. Testimonio in the Migrant Program
> seemed to be both. Thus, as the beloved Rusos teach us, you can ascend to
> both abstract and concrete.
> I think about the time and effort that went into creating the
> autobiographies (a form of testimonio) that Profe Gutiérrez references.
> They were a culmination for us as a scholarly community. And they left
> people altered. (Another cool insight inspired by Hegel and Marx - when
> humans learn, they become altered matter. Living, breathing matter,
> capable of experiencing. And in the words of Piaget, I believe,
> experiencing our experiences.) The versatility, the many facets of
> testimonio are beautiful to ruminate on. Given my life experience, I
> rejoice in thinking about the ways that testimonio - bearing witness to
> life via narrative - can give historical depth to a person's actions, to a
> community's actions.
> To illustrate, I remember putting together the reader for the program. We
> would stay all night in Moore Hall with making copies and feeling energized
> in thinking about migrant families sending their high school-aged children
> to reside and study with us for a month. The way I pictured those families
> - and this is key for people like Marx Wartofsky who cared deeply about the
> actual look of our imaginations - was through a long corridor of
> experience. It was just me at 2am extending the look down the hallway, but
> instead of a wall at the far end, I pictured families I knew, and imagined
> the ones I didn't know. I could see them and they could see me. Our work
> was similar in that instant: preparing the way for the youth. At times, it
> was incredibly vivid, but that grew over time and through the many
> testimonios we fostered and experienced. Even the testimonio requires
> witness for it to live on. (See: Carolyn Forché and her "poetry of
> witness.") And that, too, had to be learned to an extent. Who showed me?
> Hector Álvarez, Carlos Tejeda, Profe Gutiérrez, Miguel Zavala, Shirin
> Vossoughi, the migrant parents, and others. Now, that was a scholarly
> Forgive the somewhat long message. I been looking to post for years, but
> in the words of the Ents from Middle Earth, I wanted to say something that
> took time to say. See you again in 2018 :)
> Manuel Luis Espinoza
It is the dilemma of psychology to deal with a natural science as an object
that creates history. Ernst Boesch.