[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Not too long and not too short
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Not too long and not too short
- From: "Glassman, Michael" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:44:20 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 220.127.116.11) email@example.com;
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHCnM0CrXLbRTM49Z0-D+t_+V9DMfhCyGs82nxVX1FgzXgi_6A@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com>, <5498C430.firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: <email@example.com>
- Thread-index: AQHQHkwdUPQc895cV0yyCrF9kqKl6pyctXsAgAABHAD//67wng==
- Thread-topic: [Xmca-l] Re: Not too long and not too short
I definitely agree that it should be place based space vs. cyberspace rather than real space vs. cyberspace. I would also say that most successful online endeavors are not transfers of place based activities to cyberspace - cyberspace activities are unique activities. Most successful virtual communities - and I feel comfortable saying I would consider lchc/xmca one of the more successful virtual communities/educational platforms in the short history of the Internet (really somebody should do a dissertation and/or write an article for WIRED on the listserv) - generally limit posts to approximately 20 lines. This is generally (almost always) what works for communities based on Bulletin Board System/conference communities which I think xmca is. Psychological reasons for this - I don't know, but there are definitely structural reasons which I won't go into (because it would shine a light on my own hypocrisy). If you move past that you are generally into another form of Internet posting - basically long form blogging. There are community blogging communities but xmca does not use that type of platform. In the time I have been on xmca there have been a few people who regularly posted very long messages but these were trusted users - this is not a title bestowed on anybody - it is a part of any successful virtual community and is part of overt or natural systems of online governance - lchc/xmca has always used an organic form of governance - don't ask me how that comes about, I also don't know, but I would point you to Howard Rheingold's writing on the WELL (Whole Earth Lectronic Link). This does not mean people should count their lines (which like an idiot I just did) but that the one screen rule is not arbitrary but may be instrumental for the community.
Michael (No the name does not count as a line!!!)
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [email@example.com] on behalf of Annalisa Aguilar [firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 8:27 PM
To: Andy Blunden; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Not too long and not too short
My conception would be meaning-making, which is all and none of the above.
> a kind of scientific symposium or maybe a conference?
> or an after dinner conversation? (or maybe a staffroom conversation)?
> a formal decision making meeting, where we address the Chair, make amendments, etc.?
> a Occupy-type general meeting?
> Or is "none of the above" the only answer?