[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: L2
I think Steve McCafferty (whom I have copied and whom I know from when we did doctoral work together) at University of Nevada has used Lantolf a lot re: L2. And I’m pretty sure Steve would be interested in your questions. Steve wrote something fairly recently on gesture in L2, which I assume can be connected to TPR (Total Physical Response). If I am wrong about any of this, I apologize, but since you are teaching the stuff this week, I thought speed was necessary.
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 4:50 AM, Martin John Packer <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
> I have to teach a class on second language learning this week in my course in Psychology of Language, so I've turned to Lantolf. My university library webpage has been down for maintenance this weekend so I've had limited access to his writing, but what I have been able to read has confused me. In a couple of articles I find reasonable summaries of LSV's ideas, but then Lantolf doesn't get around to applying these ideas to L2! Looking at abstracts in Google Scholar it seems that he's proposing that (1) L2 is learned in the ZPD (what isn't?), (2) L2 is a mediator (what isn't?), and (3) private speech occurs in L2 (okay, that could be interesting). I was expecting him to attribute some role to L2 in the higher functions, or to suggest that L2 mediates in a specific way, or...
> What am I missing?
> Plus, I have a growing suspicion that most L2 research is conducted on people willingly studying a foreign language in the classroom. Not much, or nothing, on people who are forced to abandon their mother tongue because they live somewhere where school, and/or work, is available only if they speak a dominant language. I'm hoping you'll tell me I'm wrong about this!
- [Xmca-l] L2
- From: Martin John Packer <firstname.lastname@example.org>