[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: how to broaden/enliven the xmca discussion
Tools, like words, are polysemic, Martin, i take it.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Martin John Packer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> One could say, couldn't one, that a tool also has both a stable, customary
> pole of functionality and a broader range of potential, possible uses? A
> hammer, for example, is customarily used to drive nails, but it can
> potentially be used in a variety of other ways that are related, one might
> say metaphorically, to this core function.
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 5:00 PM, David Kellogg <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The idea that the latter is merely meaning potential and the former is
> > actual, realized, materialized meaning comes straight from Halliday.
> > But the (for me, linked) idea that the latter is the most stable pole
> > of word value and the former the least so comes straight from
> > Volosinov, who influenced Halliday via the Prague linguists.
It is the dilemma of psychology to deal with a natural science with an
object that creates history. Ernst Boesch.