[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xmca-l] Re: Jesper Juul, Ludologist
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Jesper Juul, Ludologist
- From: Huw Lloyd <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:25:34 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CACwG6DugH-o9H8RSVNDZh0=7zkMirdWxxKAfTdYq1hJAsweuhw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca-l>
- List-help: <mailto:email@example.com?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca-l.mailman.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca-l>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CACwG6DugH-o9H8RSVNDZh0=7zkMirdWxxKAfTdYq1hJAsweuhw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Sender: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On 13 May 2014 02:28, David Kellogg <email@example.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know anything about the work of Jesper Juul, the ludologist?
> ( don't mean the Danish Doctor Spock.)
> Jesper Juul, ludologist, has apparently written several books on computer
> games, including one on the curious paradox that gaming is something we do
> for fun even though (despite knowing that) it will soon make us unhappy
> (like television and certain forms of drugs).
> I've only read one article of his, where he talks about playerless games
> (by which he means games that have no role for free will). It's mostly an
> intellectual exercise--a kind of gedankenexperiment which is really
> designed to show why we do need players and paradoxically why we should
> avoid thinking about play without thinking about the intrinsic quality of
> the game as well.
There's a link to his PhD thesis on the link Wagner posted, I believe.
>From the messages there it looks like hes mostly interested in writing
> (I am actually thinking about this in the context of vocabulary
> research--what factors are intrinsic to the word, which are text intrinsic
> and which only inhere in the interaction between the learner and the
At a broad guess, is this driven by notions of completeness with respect
to dialogic utterances in comparison to dialogic actions?
Radzikhovskii wrote a fine paper pertaining to this:
Activity: Structure, genesis, and units of analysis.
Soviet Psychology, Vol 23(2), 1984-1985, 35-53.
> David Kellogg
> Hankuk University of Foreign Studies