[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xmca-l] Re: Ignorance as a driver in science



One question that matters to me relates to the impact of schooling on human development widely understood. I growingly think that schooling is not compatible with the natural processes of cultural learning, as described by Tomasello. The question that arises is whether we can come up with scalable and inclusive alternatives that are informed by what we now know are species compatible ways of instructing and learning.
David

On Apr 1, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Laure Kloetzer <laure.kloetzer@gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess How to questions are as interesting, aren't they ?
> Cheers
> LK
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-04-01 13:37 GMT+02:00 Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net>:
> 
>> Laure,
>> I have lots of questions, but they are all "how to" not "what is"
>> questions.
>> Andy
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Andy Blunden*
>> http://home.mira.net/~andy/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Laure Kloetzer wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>> 
>>> As part of an introduction course on psychology here in France, I plan to
>>> work with my students partly on Stuart Firestein's book on the value of
>>> Ignorance to drive scientific research. I would like to ask you a related
>>> question. Would you accept to share with the community here your answers
>>> to
>>> the following question:
>>> 
>>> Which are the unsolved psychological questions on which you would dream to
>>> get an answer in the next ten years ?
>>> 
>>> I plan to ask the same question to the COGDEV online community (cognition
>>> and development).
>>> 
>>> The goal would be (a) to show the students that there are a lot of things
>>> that we don't know yet, (b) that this "ignorance" is exciting, and (c) to
>>> compare how different researchers / fields frame the field of ignorance,
>>> (d) to relate these current psychological questions to our life and world.
>>> I guess my perspective is to wonder how we may open alternatives to an
>>> accumulative model of science, which prevents the students from engaging
>>> truly in exploration, as they believe they don't know the basics (which is
>>> also true. They also need to understand the basics, but not to be crushed
>>> under them).
>>> 
>>> What do you think of this ? What would your unsolved psychological
>>> questions be ?
>>> Thanks for your help,
>>> Best,
>>> LK
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>