[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Educational neuroscience - from Mike Cole
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Educational neuroscience - from Mike Cole
- From: Andy Blunden <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:42:31 +1000
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <51F72F94.email@example.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <51F72F94.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: email@example.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
- User-agent: Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 (Windows/20090812)
So we have 4 distinct but interrelated concepts: system, model, unit of
analysis and method.
I will try to formulate a view on unit of analysis and method.
The idea of "artefact-mediated (collaborative) action" as a unit of
analysis (a generalisation of "word meaning") is the basis for the
"method of dual stimulation," as I see it.
Once you have a concept of that S - X - R triangle, as the unit of
action, then it suggests a method of investigation based on offering the
auxilliary stimulus, the artifact X, to the subject, S, to assist them
to complete the task, R. By varying teh artefact X and the task R,
investigation of S is possible.
Likewise, let us suppose that you see the mind as a psychological system
made up of functional subsystems each of which are interconnected,
irrespective of whether the subsystem in question itself produces
observable phenomena. This could be represented in a diagram, too,
something like S -> Ssys1 ---> Ssys2 -> R, meaning that every subsystem
(Ssys1) is connected with every other (Ssys2), and disturbance of Ssys1
will cause a disturbance to Ssys2, which may be manifeted in an
observable response, R.
So the implication of this is that the "unit of analysis" of an entire
psychological system is two functional subsystems with an
interconnection. Ssys1 --- Ssys2.
This is not trivial, because much of Ssys1 will not be observable, and
this unit of analysis allows the investigator to study Ssys1 by means of
the observable responses via Ssys2.
The unit of analysis suggests the method.
Andy Blunden wrote:
I think the issue is HOW one makes observable the "unintended motor
The issue of whether the combined motor *method* is a unit of
analysis. I think it is a method.
what whole is it the simplest instance of? It is a method for being
able to identify with some degree of certainty what another person is
thinking about. Help me get from there to what it is a unit of
ps- why is this not on xmca....
(Andy mistakenly sent his previous message to Mike alone. This is just
to put it all back on xmca)
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/