[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] http://marxismocritico.com/category/psicologia-marxista/



On 15 Dec 2012, at 15:56, Larry Purss wrote:

> The question which needs to be asked is if THIS tradition [tacit
> presentations] is "merely interactional" as Andy suggests or is it
> potentially possible to expand this interactional "picture" to also engaged
> cultural HISTORICAL  ARTIFACTS [tools language symbols] within THIS
> presentational understanding.  Presentations which are tacitly shared while
> participating in "joint action" or dialogical enactments.

Dear Larry (and all),  I'm wondering if the following response might be helpful in relation to your need to ask if tacit presentations are 'merely interactional' as Andy suggests or is it potentially possible to expand this interactional 'picture' to also engaged cultural historical artifacts within this presentational understandings? Presentations which are tacitly shared while participating in 'joint action' or dialogical enactments.

I think that the reason I don't feel a need to ask these questions is because I've already answered them to my satisfaction (although I'm open to being shown that my answers are not adequate).

My answer to your question about expanding this interactional 'picture' is that it is not only potentially possible to engage with cultural historical artefacts within the presentational understandings. I believe that I've produced evidence-based explanations of educational influences in learning that demonstrate this possibility in practice.

Keith Kinsella's graduation last Wednesday marks the last of my doctoral supervisions at the University of Bath and I've put over 30 of the successful supervisions between 1995-2012 in the living theory section of http://www.actionresearch.net at http://www.actionresearch.net/living/living.shtml .

My spontaneously responsive, dialogically-structured relations with those I've supervised, carry the cultural historical artifacts of critical theorists such as Erich Fromm and Jurgen Habermas. 

I think I've shown how my educational responses can carry cultural historical artefacts in:

Educative Relations in a New Era
  
Paper published in Pedagogy, Culture & Society, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 73-90, 1999 - see http://www.actionresearch.net/writings/CS4.htm

In my spontaneously responsive, dialogically-structured relations I also carry within my tacit knowledge Habermas' four criteria of social validity from his Communication and the Evolution of Society. By this I mean that within the dialogically structured relationships I integrate questions about comprehensibility, rightness, truthfulness and authenticity.

I'm hoping that my responses relate to your questions.

Love Jack.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
When Martin Dobson, a colleague, died in 2002 the last thing he said to me
was 'Give my Love to the Department'. In the 20 years I'd worked with
Martin it was his loving warmth of humanity that I recall with great life
affirming pleasure and I'm hoping that in Love Jack we can share this
value of common humanity.

Jack Whitehead , Adjunct Professor, Liverpool Hope University, UK.    
        
Honorary Research Fellow, University of Cumbria

Life-time member of OMNIBUS (All Bath University Staff).

web-site http://www.actionresearch.net with email address. 



__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca