[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] Francois Cooren
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [xmca] Francois Cooren
- From: Greg Thompson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 22:56:22 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yLaVyf6WNtnpF6CtqSU4+g/1Y/aqH+sObrlb3UBDyTM=; b=JWVwM79DwaRJmnl2rn/bIUrinSVB2grmPx5BeRMR1aCGPRFBbO2MD65D30165iQGTS XoYXNcsvJqg6x6uQEw2prr8ujrSj0KIjxrcWmGXh/s8wBR/+4leptGf2vJIJs1FBMrON NEHRjNhOCJPdDwcJpC5R2gA+ZAV4QR9aHUce1M/ch6NecrQPtd6xyPgk05bnB/Ky4ZpH zJnjcrwQj3sayuNH1Rb+23sus206481/aQyFQVcIo3Hf3bizvFtycaH957sqwJ4gdRwd jwDPcjH/gEad85B4TCT7hOFuSc6EXjnzqGmFFx0DzVN6mdSTAh6ZbARC2q57I3mrVAhF NLvQ==
- In-reply-to: <CAHCnM0AMxdWWsRaeWQWh36i=_i5VW3Kv8OMU9EO+YQpGGBp+SA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <CAHH++P=BN22yh4DNu5W=bBeZs6ZfBwx=nhFZCy0pATHt6vwuFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGaCnpwp6U+pDiK39+_mFWrPa6PNX87_7oBfjLj-RH0_9SB0Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHCnM0AMxdWWsRaeWQWh36i=_i5VW3Kv8OMU9EO+YQpGGBp+SA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
don't know about ventriloquation/dual stimulation (sounds promising).
Rather I'm seeing connections to a processual/relational ontology in which
the medium (communication) constitutes the so-called "things" of the world.
(cf. Korzybski, Abbott, and Packer), with an answer to "how so" that
considers micro-interaction. Very appealing (to me).
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:35 PM, mike cole <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I wonder if ventriloquation is related in any way to the notion of dual
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Larry Purss <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Greg, here is a further description of the book. It seems to be the book
> > is putting into question a similar theme to Gadamer who suggests
> > history has its own agency [living text] and the *fusion* of
> > modify [expand] BOTH horizons. The text has its own agency.
> > Not sure if Gadamer is included in this book but the theme seems
> > fascinating [and a way to understand organizations]
> > The cost of the book is prohibitive but the theme is fascinating.
> > Larry
> > FROM THE PUBLISHER
> > What happens when people communicate or dialogue with each other? This is
> > the daunting question that this book proposes to address by starting
> from a
> > controversial hypothesis: What if human interactants were not the only
> > to be considered, paraphrasing Austin (1962), as 'doing things with
> > That is, what if other 'things' could also be granted the status of
> > in a dialogical situation? "Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion,
> > Incarnation, and Ventriloquism" proposes to explore this unique
> > by mobilizing metaphorically the notion of ventriloquism. According to
> > ventriloqual perspective, interactions are never purely local, but
> > dislocal, that is, they constantly mobilize figures (collectives,
> > principles, values, emotions, etc.) that incarnate themselves in people's
> > discussions. This highly original book, which develops the analytical,
> > practical and ethical dimensions of such a theoretical positioning, may
> > of interest to communication scholars, linguists, sociologists,
> > conversation analysts, management and organizational scholars, as well as
> > philosophers interested in language, action and ethics.
> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Greg Thompson <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > >wrote:
> > > Anyone out there know much about Francois Cooren or the Montreal School
> > of
> > > Organizational Communication?
> > >
> > > As for the former, Cooren's book Action and Agency in Dialogue asks:
> > > "What if human interactants were not the only ones to be considered,
> > > paraphrasing Austin (1962), as “doing things with words”? That is, what
> > if
> > > other “things” could also be granted the status of agents in a
> > > situation?"
> > >
> > > As for the latter, the MSOC is characterized by wikipedia as:
> > > "taking communication as the "site and surface" of organizations,
> > > that the latter emerge from and are maintained by communication
> > processes."
> > >
> > > Both of these seem to be very important points that, I thought,
> > articulate
> > > well with recent XMCA conversations.
> > >
> > > Anyone have any insight?
> > > Perhaps a recommendation?
> > > -greg
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
> > > Sanford I. Berman Post-Doctoral Scholar
> > > Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition
> > > Department of Communication
> > > University of California, San Diego
> > > http://ucsd.academia.edu/GregoryThompson
> > > __________________________________________
> > > _____
> > > xmca mailing list
> > > email@example.com
> > > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> > >
> > __________________________________________
> > _____
> > xmca mailing list
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
> xmca mailing list
Gregory A. Thompson, Ph.D.
Sanford I. Berman Post-Doctoral Scholar
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition
Department of Communication
University of California, San Diego
xmca mailing list