[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Re:Fernando on LSV

Just to connect a couple dots:
Mike's distinction between instrumental mediation and semiosic/cultural mediation is in line with the differentiation between techne for poiesis vs phronesis for praxis that has been discussed in other threads (re: Carr, action research, Gadamer, Aristotle, etc.) 

Now back to a couple thesis proposals ...

On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, mike cole wrote:


As I understand it, Monica, Rey is claiming (and in this agrees with many on
xmca, but not others) that the LSV of Psychology of Art was displaced for
several years by an instrumentalist Vygotsky. LSV liked to quote
Bacon: *Neither
hand nor mind alone, left to themselves,  amounts to much; instruments and
aids are  the means to perfection. *Bruner highlights this idea in his 1962
preface to LSV.

This view was easily assimilatable by American learning theorists in general
and those interested in the role of culture in learning in particular. For
the former, it appeared to be a rephrasing of what was called "mediated
stimulus-response learning" diagramed in a triangle with an x at the apex.
For the latter (me, for example) that little x and that kind of
instrumentalism provided a perfect way to think about culturally mediated
psychological processes. Similar interpretations can be made of Dewey.

But such instrumentalism has several (at least) drawbacks. Firstly, it
under-guestimates the polysemy of tools (and of course, the "tool of
tools."). In such under-guestimation it over specifies the goal (e.g., it is
easily reduced to the kind of functionalism that many argue against).
Thirdly, when these two pits are fallen into, it makes meaning MAKING, the
process of constantly imagining the future to be able to act in the present,
disappear from view.

Presumably, according to this line of thinking, the late Vygotsky has thrown
off instrumentalism and become a semiotic theorist. Then the problem becomes
one of not tipping over into idealism in which all is interpretation
obdurate reality "only" imagined.

I am not being so foolhardy to say that any of this is correct. But it is
how I interpret Fernando's argument. Anton, David, Van der Veer, Valsiner,
and others are the one's who can provide a more nuanced view of sequences
and relationships across the 1924-1934 period.

mike
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Monica Hansen <
monica.hansen@vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:


I am still working on the taking in the Rey article. Some of you are so
fast! I need a couple of nights of sleep at least.

In looking at the last bit of this post, Mike, can you clarify a couple of
things? You write that the work from Rey's "middle period" of Vygotsky's
work was more "easily assimilable"? What does that mean? And for who was it
more easily assimilable? For the translators and editors of the earlier
English editions or for the American and English reading audience who would
then go on to use it in their work? And then also, what issues of Larry's
and others do you think the "middle period" fails to orient us on? Is it
the
issue with "instrumentalism" and "reductionist" methods and the following
"objectivism"?

Just trying to catch up and discuss. I know I have more to read in postings
so you may have already clarified.

Thanks,
Monica

-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of mike cole
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:59 AM
To: ablunden@mira.net; eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] Article for Discussion

The answer to your question, Andy, is that you should ask if we can post
the
williams article for discussion in papers for discussion. After we discuss
Fernando's paper, we could turn to it. I agree, its very relevant, taking
up
the Lave-McDermott Marx-->Learning paper from Outlines (I think) and
arguing
for use value in education.

As to Fernando's paper, I have a different view.

Roughly, I interpret him as arguing that the focus on the period when LSV
et
al were doing "instrumental" psychology, the instrumentalism involved
reductions that had unfortunate consequences but it was this aspect/period
of the work that English speakers focused on. The ties to Dewey here are
obvious and behaviorism ditto
(Skinner was in many ways following the lessons of his interpretation of
pragmatism).

Fernando, reading the outpouring of materials in English sees what he
thinks
is a narrow focus and seeks to counter by pointing backward toward Psych of
art and forward to the late work. So, rather than focus on periodization,
wouldn't it be more
productive to focus on the extent to which the middle period which
interested us so
much, perhaps because it was more easily assimilable (for which see passim
all the criticism you care to read on the topic!) fails to orient us to the
issues that Larry and others have been focusing on?

mike

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:


Mike, I've been reading this article by Fernando Gonzales Rey, but I

really

am not interested in discusssing it. His periodisation of Vygotsky does
nothing for me. I mean, to describe Vygotsky's view of the development of
higher psychological functionse, as "objectivist" and some kind of
regression from the period before he wrote "Historical Crisis", which

puts

him in the same basket as Behaviourism,  is just so remote from how I

read

Vygotsky, I would rather just bow out of the discussion. I admit, I

stopped

reading before I got through reading Rey on this period in which Vygotsky
apparently went backwards.

Any chance we could squeeze two articles out of Taylor & Francis for
discussion? I would like to see a discussion about Julian Williams'

effort

to connect up a critique of formal education and Marx's analysis of
capitalism and commodity production. Could we have two going at the same
time?

Andy

mike cole wrote:


THNX FOR PICKING UP THE MISTAKE< ANDY
M

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net<mailto:
ablunden@mira.net>> wrote:

   Mike, you forgot to cc us all, but is the cc above still right for
   Fernando?
   andy

   mike cole wrote:


   Fernando Rey on turning points in Vygotsky's thinking was selected

in

a last
   minute rush of votes. I am having the article posted for all the

world

to read, but meantime, see attached.

   The author, currrently living in Brasilia, is cc'ed.
   mike


 ------------------------------**------------------------------*

*------------

   ______________________________**____________
   _____
   xmca mailing list
   xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>


http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/**listinfo/xmca<
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list
info/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list%0Ainfo/xmca>>





   --

------------------------------**------------------------------*

*------------
   *Andy Blunden*
   Joint Editor MCA:


http://www.informaworld.com/**smpp/title~db=all~content=**g932564744
<http://
www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Edb=all%7Econtent=g932564744>

   <http://www.informaworld.com/**smpp/title%7Edb=all%7Econtent=**


g932564744<
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Edb=all%7Econtent=g932564
744>



   Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
   <http://home.mira.net/%7Eandy/**>
   Book:

http://www.brill.nl/default.**aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<
http://www.brill.nl/
default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<http://www.brill.nl/%0Adefault.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857>





<http://www.brill.nl/default.**aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<
http://www.brill.nl
/default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857>



   MIA: http://www.marxists.org

   ______________________________**____________
   _____
   xmca mailing list
   xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <mailto:xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>


http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/**listinfo/xmca<
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list
info/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list%0Ainfo/xmca>>





--
------------------------------**------------------------------**
------------
*Andy Blunden*
Joint Editor MCA:

http://www.informaworld.com/**smpp/title~db=all~content=



**g932564744<
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Edb=all%7Econtent=g9325
64744>

Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/
Book:

http://www.brill.nl/default.**aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<
http://www.brill.nl/
default.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857<http://www.brill.nl/%0Adefault.aspx?partid=227&pid=34857>


MIA: http://www.marxists.org

______________________________**____________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu


http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/**listinfo/xmca<
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list
info/xmca <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/list%0Ainfo/xmca>>



__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca



__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca



Tony Whitson
UD School of Education
NEWARK  DE  19716

twhitson@udel.edu
_______________________________

"those who fail to reread
 are obliged to read the same story everywhere"
                  -- Roland Barthes, S/Z (1970)
__________________________________________
_____
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca