[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2 bits Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
- To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: 2 bits Re: [xmca]-- LONG trails of prior messages help!!
- From: mike cole <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:01:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8e6TdYY1l3dN33cA622l+/91mkPr533xWXjMZBoVBpg=; b=jnZW9Uo+OhLo+vz7Fmrg54JnD3ahhDz39lLIlvq7a6c8WqxX0lQM3bsrEB1jjYCv4j ZVWvCoWfsDACG6Yek8myW2EmJ/HjQPysW18WYqGZg40j2D/uKbdvnBQHhrx57Hmm5n4V 8RJN5hfnEhSWGjqj2tMdoqb0GoEif1AL7k+q0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=Dg4ub14b5gjC9mzuSPfS/Qej50aIBDX+qXJ9VZzCIxY5WNqRildcPXBT+J1dYFdVys 1ru8RFv5vQB8+TNaCPy7/s1ZwYrQiqaDwohymCFxhFVAHxPVMvkw9lhjxCW/3aV7gTeM QI/V3/StnZOQLh9pU453aZ97EABPesJV4DMTg=
- In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.60L.email@example.com>
- List-archive: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/xmca>
- List-help: <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=help>
- List-id: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca.weber.ucsd.edu>
- List-post: <mailto:email@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <BANLkTikoxDzb5hETx0vVjQdtnTp3S-mFsA@mail.gmail.com> <B0FED0D1-81A0-4415-A035-26BD4421FFA9@umich.edu> <Pine.SOL.4.60L.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: email@example.com, "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: email@example.com
I'll bid .25$ for your contribution of actualist ontology, Tony.
The "long string problem" seems to be ebbing. Lets hope the flow of ideas
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Tony Whitson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 1. Huw has been doing an exemplary job on this. By "I'llexemplary," I mean
> he's providing a superb example of how to handle this.
> 2. When I don't have time to really participate -- follow up, etc. -- I
> resist the temptation to speak up (almost as an ethical matter: that I
> shouldn't speak if I'm not able to engage). However, on this extremely rich,
> interesting, and important thread, let me just offer this:
> However else we might want to specify what "concepts" are, they are, most
> profoundly, semiosic (in the Peircean sense) formations. My own take is
> that, as semiosis is activity, "concepts" are formations in/of activity. For
> me, this is a matter of an actualist ( > action) ontology, as differentiated
> from a realist ( > "rei"="things") ontology.
> Again, I am violating my own rule against putting in my own "2 cents" when
> I'm not available to follow through. (I could detail demands on my time now;
> but you don't need to hear from me about such excuses.)
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Jay Lemke wrote:
> When a topic like Concepts has gotten as long as this one has, my advice
>> is to delete all the quoted prior messages except the most recent two or
>> three. That should help.
>> By the way, it is NOT easy to do this the first time, but after someone
>> takes the plunge, it will be easy for the rest of us.
>> Jay Lemke
>> Senior Research Scientist
>> Laboratory for Comparative Human Cognition
>> University of California - San Diego
>> 9500 Gilman Drive
>> La Jolla, California 92093-0506
>> Professor (Adjunct status 2009-11)
>> School of Education
>> University of Michigan
>> Ann Arbor, MI 48109
>> www.umich.edu/~jaylemke <http://www.umich.edu/%7Ejaylemke>
>> Professor Emeritus
>> City University of New York
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list