[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xmca] concepts
For a definition of 'activity,' and related terms, there's the paper by Charles Tolman:
On Apr 17, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>> :) Huw has that one at the moment.
>> But as "activity" is the fundamental concept of my
>> philosophy, I can't define it in terms of anything else,
>> just explain it, to give you the general idea.
> Here's my take: if it's a concept, then it can be derived from other
> concepts within the constellation (paradigm/framework). Everything is
> e.g. process can be derived from interaction of structure. System is
> tricky, but do-able.
>> But, a
>> philosophy can only have one concept like that!
> xmca mailing list
xmca mailing list