[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery



Hay fever could not hav been very common when we were hunters... but more common when we beacme peasants... and bowel evacuation (what a word, have never heard it before... but my dictionary had :-) differs a lot in relation to different cultures.... eat animals or vegetables and you will see (smell and feel) the difference
Andy, thanks for your references to old Fred

Leif
Sweden
meat eater and hay fever when I was younger and worked at my uncle's farm... not now in front of my computer

15 okt 2010 kl. 09.21 skrev Carol Macdonald:

Carol says to Andy,
This bothers me a little, not because of mediation, which is acquired, but what about natural body functions, such as bowel evacuation, and hay fever (says she more politely). Andy, surely these are not artefacts? (I only stuck in hay fever to be more polite, because you can tell me that hay fever
is acquired, but it's through autoimmune functions.)
Carol

On 15 October 2010 07:01, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

My claim is, David, not just that (for example) my fingers are functionally
artefacts because I use them to play the piano, but also they are
genetically artefacts because they are the products of art. "Labour created man himself" as old Fred said. If we are going to claim that thinking is artefact-mediated activity, then we must accept our bodies as artefacts, or abandon other important definitions of artefact, as mediator of activity, material product of human labour and the substance of culture. We fashion our bodies for the purpose of constructing a culture just as surely as we fashion our buildings, our domestic animals, our food and clothing and
everything else.

You can define a word how you like, but the importance of realising that our bodies are products of human labour which we use as both instruments and symbols, just like our white canes and spectacles, is demonstrated by intersubjectivists who simply overlook the role of artefacts as mediators altogether. In part this is possible because they subsume the human body into the notion of 'subject', something which also allows them to scoot over all sorts of tricky philosophical problems entailed in recognizing the active participation of subjectivity in what would otherwise be simply a complex series of material interactions. The result, contradictorily is a
far worse Cartesian dualism than the one they tried to avoid.

No, I thought long and hard about this, and the conclusion is inescapable:
the human body is an artefact.

Andy
/ //// /


David Kellogg wrote:

Sometimes I would really like to be a mosquito in the room when Martin is giving his course on developmental psychology. But I would probably want to
bite the student who asked if the replacement of social relations in
language (e.g. discourse) by psychological ones (e.g. grammar) is a "fact" or just one of Martin's ideas; the question strikes me as rather more
bumbling and humbling.
Fortunately, I have my own Thursday night session, which this semester is all about systemic functional linguistics and conversation analysis. Last night we were discussing the difference between them, and I pointed out that the systemic view is quite consistent with the idea of language as an
artefact and the conversation analysis view is much less so.
 Take, for example, the problem of repair. A teacher walks into a
classroom.
 T: Good morning, everybody.
Ss: Good morning, everybody!
T: !!!!
The conversation is broken. But in order to repair it, the teacher does not pull over and stop. The teacher has to keep going. The teacher has to find out what exactly the kids mean, if anything (are they simply repeating what they heard, as seems likely, or are they including their classmates in
their reply to the teacher?)
This means that even quite simple conversations (the sort we have with third graders) are quite gnarly and knobbled; they have convolutions and introvolutions, knots and whorls and burls of negotiation. Conversations exhibit very few of the genetic or structural of mechanical tools, and in fact only resemble "tools" only if we take a quite narrowly functionalist squint and presuppose a coinciding will that wields them. It even seems to
me that they are misconstrued when we say that they are artefacts.
I think the Romantics, especially Herder, would agree with this view: I think they would have been rather horrified at Andy's idea that a body is an artefact in the same sense as a tool is an artefact. They would point out that it is not genetically so; the body is a natural product and not man made. It is also not structurally so: unlike other artefacts, much of its structure reflects self-replication and not other-fabrication. Of course, we may say that a body is FUNCTIONALLY like an artefact, because we use it
as a tool in various ways. But if we privilege this particular
interpretation of the body over the genetic, or the structural, account, it seems to me we get a pretty functionalist view of things. A body involved in a conversation is not an artefact; it's more like a work of art, and the gratuitous and organic complexity of conversation is an indelible sign of
this.
 David Kellogg
Seoul National University of Education
--- On Thu, 10/14/10, Paula M Towsey <paulat@johnwtowsey.co.za> wrote:


From: Paula M Towsey <paulat@johnwtowsey.co.za>
Subject: RE: [xmca] Tom Toolery
To: ablunden@mira.net, "'eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity'" <
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 2010, 5:40 AM


Hello Andy-of-the-5-o'clock-shadow

Yet it's a different kind of gnashing of teeth (and wailing and weeping) when the baboons at Third Bridge get stuck into the tinned supplies...

Paula



_________________________________
Paula M Towsey
PhD Candidate: Universiteit Leiden
Faculty of Social Sciences



-----Original Message-----
From: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu [mailto:xmca- bounces@weber.ucsd.edu] On
Behalf Of Andy Blunden
Sent: 14 October 2010 13:19
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: Re: [xmca] Tom Toolery

My answer, Paula: yes.
My body, with its various parts, is an artefact; according to context,
symbol or tool.
My face and my 5 o'clock shadow is a symbol just as much as the shirt I
wear. My teeth a tool just as much as a can opener.

Andy

Paula M Towsey wrote:


For some inexplicable reason while watching Mike's blind man with a stick video, I remembered smsing Carol with a quirky question: if a researcher without a knife is trying to open an airline packet of peanuts, and she
resorts to using her teeth, what tool is she using?

Though, perhaps the better question would be - is she using a tool.?


_________________________________

Paula M Towsey

PhD Candidate: Universiteit Leiden

Faculty of Social Sciences



_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca





--
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
*Andy Blunden*
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ <http://home.mira.net/% 7Eandy/>
Videos: http://vimeo.com/user3478333/videos
Book: http://www.brill.nl/scss


_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca



     _______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca





--
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
*Andy Blunden*
Home Page: http://home.mira.net/~andy/ <http://home.mira.net/% 7Eandy/>
Videos: http://vimeo.com/user3478333/videos
Book: http://www.brill.nl/scss


_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca




--
WORK as:
Visiting Lecturer
Wits School of Education
HOME (please use these details)
6 Andover Road
Westdene
Johannesburg 2092
+27 (0)11 673 9265   +27 (0)82 562 1050
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca