Re: [xmca] Language as the link between emotions and culture.

[ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org]

Hello Joseph:

I would be happy to try and clarify my thinking.  Here goes my attempt.

Within the framework of human development there is the field of thought 
that embraces stages and then the one LSV proposed which views development 
as a genesis (a coming into being) that has fits and starts, regressions, 
explosions and then ultimately conceptions that are mediated via cultural 
artefacts.  I am hesitant about using the word linking when describing 
what occurs between emotion and language because it balances more towards 
the stages view of development rather than a genetic view of development. 
Stages interpreted as meaning that the current stage sublimates the prior 
stage and does include what came before.  Transition on the other hand 
holds dear what came before and includes the predecessor within the 
current.  Does that make sense?

eric




Joseph Gilbert <joeg4us@roadrunner.com>
Sent by: xmca-bounces@weber.ucsd.edu
12/02/2009 11:57 AM
Please respond to "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity"

 
        To:     "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [xmca] Language as the link between emotions and culture.


Eric, Please clarify the following thought. What do you mean here? 
Maybe I should get it, but I don't, yet.

                                 J.G.

1 thought:  Linking leaves the development behind; please consider the
connection to be a transition?

eric

On Dec 1, 2009, at 8:19 PM, ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org wrote:

> 1 thought:  Linking leaves the development behind; please consider the
> connection to be a transition?
>
> eric

_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca


_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca