Eric,
Have you read
Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2006). The Collective Mediation of a High-Stakes
Accountability Program: Communities and Networks of Practice. Mind,
Culture, and Activity, 13(2), 80-100.
This article was selected for XMCA discussion, but it hasn't been
discussed much. I read it when it appeared, & there's a lot I'd like to
discuss, but I did not have the time then.
Anyway, it does show CHAT successfully at work in the NCLB environment
(or so the authors claim, justifiably, as far as I can tell).
Incidentally, they also refer to another site where there was not a
successful community of practice. Apparently this is or will be written up
elsewhere. Interpretation from the one case is incomplete without the
other, contrasting case, IMHO.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007
ERIC.RAMBERG@spps.org wrote:
>
> Julian:
>
> I certainly think it all matters. Unfortunately, I am entrenched in No
> Child Left Behind and showind adequately yearly progress. So, un less CHAT
> can start showing evidence of individual growth it will be left as an also
> ran. I do not want to see that happen. I do not know how to dovetail CHAT
> with standardized tests. I am not that smart. Let us continue the
> discourse and maybe I will get a little less dumb.
>
> eric
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
Received on Wed Jun 6 08:02 PDT 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 01 2007 - 00:30:04 PDT