Ana,
I've found this book quite helpful when exploring your question. The
introduction alone provides a good foundation.
Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R-L. (Eds.) Perspectives in
activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. xiii, 462,
----- Original Message -----
From: "A. G" <anaguenthner@gmail.com>
To: "eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity" <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [xmca] Situated cognition vs. Socio-cultural theory
> Hello,
>
> I have been following this thread since July 11 and still need to pin
> down how they can be differentiated.
>
> Bremme's suggestion on Barab and Duffy could clarify CoP in learning
> but is there a definitive line between situated learning and socio-
> cultural learning? Should it be viewed as trajectory and separate
> (Mary) or grey areas that intertwine within both thoughts?
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Mary K. Bryson wrote:
> " Situated cognition work can sound a lot like socio-cultural work
> when both camps of theorists are writing about the conditions within
> which significant educational activity takes place."
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xmca mailing list
> xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
> http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
>
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 01:00:14 PST