Re: [xmca] Re: SCAFFOLDING

From: Phil Chappell (philchappell@mac.com)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:46:09 PDT


On 01/06/2006, at 7:34 PM, bb wrote:

> If language is thought as a scaffold, it normally does not go away.

It becomes something much more fundamental, doesn't it?
_______________________________________________
xmca mailing list
xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 05 2006 - 08:11:24 PDT