Re: [xmca] LCA: AA Leontiev and Landolf/Thorne question

From: Gordon Wells (gwells@ucsc.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 04 2005 - 18:34:44 PDT


>In seeking to figure out activity-language relations, a question I
>keep coming up against
>is what is meant by phrases such as
>
>"As far as psychology is concerned, speech is identical to any other
>activity" (p. 1 of AA Leontiev)
>or the phrase, "communicative activity." I know this is an old issue
>in Russian (at least Soviet) arguments about activity
>and Language. But it appears important to this discussion as well.
>
>I can understand how seeking to acquire a second language could be
>considered an activity (at least I think I do), but acquisition
>of a first language let alone using language in a case is "Mr Smith
>is not working today, he is out mowing the lawn" both seem
>questionable as candidates for activities.
>
>Is there a known, well worked out answer to this question, or a set
>of alternative answers?
>mike

See my previous ruminations.

Gordon

-- 
Gordon Wells
Dept of Education,		http://education.ucsc.edu/faculty/gwells
UC Santa Cruz.
gwells@ucsc.edu

_______________________________________________ xmca mailing list xmca@weber.ucsd.edu http://dss.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/xmca



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 01 2005 - 01:00:53 PDT