Bill wrote:
I just like to play.
I'm left looking for some semiotic means that
explicitely represents transformations, something like an "action-algebra" or
"action-configuration-space".
Got one?
What I too like about this dialogue is the play. And in response to Bills question, I keep coming back, playfully, though not explicitly, to basic Buddhist ideas about flux, impermanence and interconnections over time, space and place and everything being in states of change and conditionality; so that in dependence on A, B arises. Buddhism seems so logically, practically sensibly relevant to broader understandings of AT.
cheers,
Sophie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 01:00:09 PDT