Re: re history in chat

From: MnFamilyMan@aol.com
Date: Mon Oct 22 2001 - 18:06:04 PDT


In a message dated 10/22/2001 11:59:47 AM Central Daylight Time,
mcole@weber.ucsd.edu writes:

> I don't see any particular problem in incorporating history into chat either,
> Bruce. Micro/meso/macro are spatial terms in Bronfenbrenner's framework.
> I prefer phylogeny, cultural-history, ontogeny, microgenesis all of which
> are historical. This does raise analytic issues, but certainly we are far
> ahead of any competitors I know of.
>
>

MIke,

I agree that your tems are much more discreptive then the prefixes.

Eric



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 01:02:00 PST