Re: re: refusal and resistance

From: Judith Diamondstone (diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 27 2001 - 07:50:08 PDT


An interesting posting from David Kirshner at the link below. the
interesting point w/ respect to socialization: Galperin's 3-part model of
appropriation presupposes both mismatch and the inexplicitness of it -- as
I read it, anyway. Prolepsis is the source of socializing agency (? not
well said but in a hurry)
j

At 06:21 AM 6/27/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Are you saying that, even though phil and dianes claim agreement, "taken as
>shared" is problematic, or are you posing particular "ideal-internal"(1)
>processes for unpacking what is not appropration?
>
>:-0
>
>(1) http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Mail/xmcamail.1998_07.dir/0037.html
>
>
>--- Judy Diamondstone <diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> >At 10:38 AM 26/06/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>> >Why can't you just agree with me?
>> >:-)
>>
>> Why can't you just take my perspective? ;-)
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
>http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 01 2001 - 01:01:43 PDT