RE: LBE and 'community' category

From: Cunningham, Donald (cunningh@indiana.edu)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 12:42:47 PDT


Bill, what criteria did you use to judge some group to be a community? I
assume, in asking this, that not all groups or collectives are communities.
Is that a valid assumption?

djc

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Barowy [mailto:wbarowy@mail.lesley.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:29 PM
To: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu
Subject: LBE and 'community' category

Just a quick comment, Don, about the category 'community' and the triangle.
 I'll be doing a presentation in DC at the end of the month about the
systemic changes at LU that would coincide with the adoption of computer
modeling practices here (for a DoE grant). The 'model' I'll be using is
the triangle, and 'community' allows the analysis of one triangle being
embedded within another,

i.e. classroom->program->school->university

in what might look rather fractal in form, if drawn completely. It is not
the only way to break out triangles hierarchically. For example lbe chpat
2 breaks them out differently into 'subject producing', 'artifact
producing' and so on. But the one i have chosen captures well the
hierarchical organizaiton of the university, and provides a way to
understand the points of friction and leverage within a large institution
that is durable in many ways. (If not the institution, then at least the
model is pliable.)

Basically a small team of us have adopted this model to help us think
through what strategies will be proactive and effective within our
university setting.

bb

Bill Barowy, Associate Professor,
Lesley University, 29 Everett Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-2790
Phone: 617-349-8168 / Fax: 617-349-8169
http://www.lesley.edu/faculty/wbarowy/Barowy.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 01 2001 - 01:01:20 PDT