Judy,
Judge your position was not the aim. I was trying to understand better your
thinking. Trying to know what you are reffering to, using the word EMOTION.
I myself always use the word AFECT to reffer to EMOTIONS and FEELINGS.
EMOTIONS to social life in general (including nonhuman interactions) and
FEELINGS exclusivelly to the socio-historical culture. This, consequentlly,
makes me put myself aside Wallon's and Ratner's distinction.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Judy Diamondstone <diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu>
Para: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Data: Domingo, 18 de Fevereiro de 2001 00:56
Assunto: Re: Bakhtin, moral answerability...
>Ricardo, I don't see the difference as useful, although I admit my
>not-seeing is not informed by the debate you refer to. I can't cut a clean
>line between biology and culture. It's a fuzzy swath of a line.
>
>What do you think?
>Judy
>
>
>>May I believe you want put yourself aside those who do not think it is
>>usefull such a difference between emotion and feeling?
>>
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 01:01:15 PST