-----Mensagem original-----
De: Judy Diamondstone <diamonju@rci.rutgers.edu>
Para: xmca@weber.ucsd.edu <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
Data: Segunda-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2001 03:55
Assunto: Re: Fw: Carl's paper
I like the idea -- was it Carl's? Andy's? that agency has not
>yet been realized because we have not yet formed a collective
>consciousness, and I don't see how that we can unless we can negotiate &
>dialog & shmarmy stuff like that. There is no object that is only
>objective....
>Judy
>
I beguin thinking, after reading your thought, in something like an
incounscious colletive agency.
>At 06:57 PM 1/21/01 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>Nate,
>>
>>you wrote:
>>
>>> what is it about how our institutions are organized,
>>> schools are run, families are supported, consumption broadcasted etc
that
>>> forms certain psychological dispositions in American children that are
>>> absent in other children.
>>
>>Isn't this type of question the only meaningful frame for any psychology
>>that would claim some relation to culture?
>>
>>
>>And isn't the further implication that the practitioners who treat
>>"individuals" perhaps attempting to treat a symptom when the cause is
>>institutional/cultural to begin with?
>>
>>Paul H. Dillon
>>
>>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 14:24:55 PST