Re: VOTE ON RULES FOR XMCA!!!!!!!!!!!!

From: Yrjö Engestrm (yrjo.engestrom@helsinki.fi)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 13:54:10 PST


At the risk of sounding destructive, I think this business about rules and
voting is crazy and alienates many xmca members, in particular
non-Americans.

Too bad.

Yrjo Engestrom

----------
>From: "Eugene Matusov" <ematusov@udel.edu>
>To: <xmca@weber.ucsd.edu>
>Subject: VOTE ON RULES FOR XMCA!!!!!!!!!!!!
>Date: ti 29. helmi 2000 08:18
>

> Hi everybody--
>
> I designed a voting booth so we can vote on rules at
> http://www.freevote.com/booth/xmca_rules
>
> Please email me after you voted so I can count how many people voted.
>
> You can add voting items (please number and sign your rule item). So, it
> makes sense to revisit the voting booth after a while to vote on new items
> suggested by people.
>
> Try to remember how many items there were when you voted so you won't vote
> twice the same items when you revisited the booth. You do not need send me
> another message if you voted on new items after revisiting the voting booth.
>
> Please, ignore the running ads -- I'm using the commercial website for
> creating the voting booth.
>
> Let me know if you have a question, concern, or suggestion about the booth.
>
> Take care,
>
> Eugene
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Dillon [mailto:dillonph@northcoast.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:02 AM
>> To: XMCA
>> Subject: Re: Paul -- on the rules proposal?
>
>> I did see that there were a number of different proposals and
>> given that the number of people participating in the discussion
>> represented
>> at best 5 percent of the people subscribed to xmca, I didn't really
>> take any single proposal as very representative. I admit to not
>> having read
>> completely: was there some consensus? How many consensed?
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 07 2000 - 17:54:15 PST