> I agree with most of what is being said about theory, and would
> like to add that for me it is also finding, making sense of the
> semiotic interior, as Arne Raeithel wrote. And when the picture
> that is painted is indeed acurate, I think that it is like a
> mirror for participants, and that it certainly enters the practice
> (phenomena in question) to change it.
>
I wonder if we can ever obtain the mirror image. Given the perspectival
nature, I think we can paint a portrait that offers very strong
resemblances but mirror images? I just don't think that's possible.