[Xmca-l] Re: xmca is lively and good

[HENRY SHONERD]

Anthony,
My involvement in the dialog waxes and wanes, having more to do with what goes on outside of the chat than within it. I think the videos have been great. I took a half hour to watch the latest and was rewarded with connecting more dots. Just a peek. David K. said in his latest video that we will need another 100 years to connect them all. It is “rather epic” as you say. A marvel. 
Henry


> On Nov 6, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Anthony Barra <anthonymbarra@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Some recent conversation at the Cultural Praxis site has speculated that xmca-based discourse is waning (e.g., https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bit.ly/369A8d6__;!!Mih3wA!VGfwzyCnvQCPJ5bZvpIl3OaGLbQPOlilkRXBEQrGycQddHII8352MjzWVf5j3CacdAjDpw$  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bit.ly/369A8d6__;!!Mih3wA!SccwXMds5fqIIEhwR3l8JTMhNvb5Mwx70_isLi1atVDVZ0r88FJDKnQBJ8MQu57_fMfowA$>).  But I don't think that is true -- not that I have much insight, history, or standing to observe confidently.
> 
> But the xmca list is rather epic -- bigger by far than any single participant and actually a marvel in various ways.  Simply peek through the archives, as I often do, to find proof positive.
> 
> This is 100% correct, is it not?
> 
> Anthony
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20201106/ece80aa7/attachment.html