[Xmca-l] Re: Social distancing = ?

[James Ma]

My point is that societal differences are themselves a signifying practice
and that language is not only referential but differential.


On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 13:20, Ulvi İçil <ulvi.icil@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can prefer to add such a meaning  to "social distancing" as in the photo
> for the working-class adding also to it "political" and "to capitalist
> class".
> "Social and political distancing to capitalist class".
> In this sense, yes, we can admit rather than reject "social distancing =
> communism".
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 11:31, James Ma <jamesma320@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Social distancing is a norm in the current pandemic crisis. More to the
>> point, I think it is already a semiosis produced and reproduced as a
>> signifying practice in which culture is inscribed as something local or
>> individual.
>> James
>>
>>
>> *__________________________________________________*
>>
>> *James Ma  Independent Scholar https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://oxford.academia.edu/JamesMa__;!!Mih3wA!RX6Nde7bjlgtxqQV4pXd9JAm5hr8d8er-Auk-THSIN5mdFFQyjtJotbKgDR60dLqRASvPw$ 
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://oxford.academia.edu/JamesMa__;!!Mih3wA!V4I8msvit6xIkWkzF51Yf_mWHu8ovN90l0mCWUo6BXAYL2MtUX0IfUNnKWskDlwT9hwCYw$>  *
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 22:03, Ulvi İçil <ulvi.icil@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucsd.edu/pipermail/xmca-l/attachments/20200426/f327af1f/attachment-0001.html