[Xmca-l] Re: MCA Issue 3 article for discussion Re-started

[lpscholar2@gmail.com]

I sent a youtube video of Susan Hoff exploring passivity within belonging to constituted (instituted?) worlds.

John William Miller believed:
If one does not begin in community, philosophy will never arrive at community and so will not be able to revise or improve any human community. Miller’s relational back and forth pairs the human act to prior community (common beginning).
This seems to follow Susan Hoff’s theme. However, Susan adds the focus on passivity (let it be) as a necessary relation to activity (taking to heart).
A spiral theme of loose threads relationally intertwined in the back and forth.
May generate a quality of education which has withdrawn from public discourse as liberalism has been ascendant. 


Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: White, Phillip
Sent: November 25, 2016 4:20 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: MCA Issue 3 article for discussion Re-started

John Stuart Mill notes the "empty husks" of education prevalent at the time (1836), that have come down through the ages.  here's his solutions:


https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/jsmill/diss-disc/civilization/civilization.s06.html

CIVILIZATION Section 6, John Stuart Mill, Civilization<https://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/jsmill/diss-disc/civilization/civilization.s06.html>
www.laits.utexas.edu
Civilization John Stuart Mill Section 6 [Improving British education] These things must bide their time. But the other of the two great desiderata, the regeneration ...





dense, but illuminating one hundred and eighty years later.


phillip

________________________________
From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu <xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu> on behalf of Huw Lloyd <huw.softdesigns@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 5:02:34 PM
To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: MCA Issue 3 article for discussion Re-started

Thanks Andy.

On 25 November 2016 at 23:38, Andy Blunden <ablunden@mira.net> wrote:

> This is not a one-off event, Huw. I writing his PhD Dissertation on the
> philosophy of Nature of Democritus and Epicurus he was taking a position
> opposite to that of Hegel. The dissertation was published in 1841 when Marx
> was aged 22. He credits Feuerbach with the impulse to take a stronger
> materialist line against Hegel with the publication of the Essence of
> Christianity in 1841. His notes on Hegel's Philosophy of Right (1843) show
> that he was trying to take a dismissive attitude to Hegel, and it is only
> in the Theses on Feuerbach and The German Ideology of 1845 where the
> outlines of Marx's distinctive critique of Hegel are clearly present, as
> David notes, in the form of a critique of Feuerbach. It is reasonable to
> suppose that he was working out this position at the time he wrote the 1844
> Manuscripts. However, he is still working on how to use Hegel as he writes
> his Political Economy material in 1857-58, after which his position is
> pretty settled. However, his turn to Hegel in 1881 to understand calculus,
> only 2 years before his death, demonstrate that this was an unfinished task.
>
> Andy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Andy Blunden
> http://home.mira.net/~andy
> http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making
> On 26/11/2016 2:58 AM, Huw Lloyd wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> Interesting too to consider Marx's mode of analysis, which pertains to
>> something I'm currently drafting.  Does anyone know when Marx specifically
>> studied and re-fashioned Hegel's dialectic?
>>
>> Best,
>> Huw
>>
>>
>>
>