[Xmca-l] Re: Slow | Experimental Swimlanes

Helena Worthen helenaworthen@gmail.com
Thu Nov 3 12:32:18 PDT 2016


I like this. In addition, I like talking about HOW to have a conversation. I like Richard's description of a "passing theory." I seem to remember that there was a lot of work done on that a dozen or more years ago. Does anyone have more background on this?

I note that I've responded quickly (10 minutes) in a "slow" lane.  How should I handle that?

Helena

Helena Worthen
helenaworthen@gmail.com
Vietnam blog: helenaworthen.wordpress.com

On Nov 3, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Huw Lloyd wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> For emails marked slow, we might have an expectancy of a "wait time" (kudos
> to Peter) of say 2 hours between emails, i.e. only reply after at least a
> two hour wait, with maybe up to a maximum of 5 emails a day.  I am
> obviously making this up -- so those with this preference can perhaps
> indicate the tempo.
> 
> And good?
> 
> Best,
> Huw




More information about the xmca-l mailing list