[Xmca-l] Re: Vygotsky.Peirce.Mediation

[Andy Blunden]

Goodness, I will really have to work harder to make my 
meaning clear, I was trying to say that in the tradition 
running through Hegel and Marx that Vygotsky was *not* a 
dualist.

I'm not sure which document captures the discussion Mike was 
talking of but try this:
http://lchc.ucsd.edu/Histarch/LAEMDI.PDF

Andy

------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Blunden
http://home.mira.net/~andy
http://www.brill.com/products/book/origins-collective-decision-making 

On 22/06/2016 1:54 AM, mike cole wrote:
> The header is a three word summary of the topic that seems to have emerged
> to engage discussion, James, so maybe use that
> or put together a header of your own. Semiotics could be there.
>
> A discussion of this topic might begin by unearthing the discussions in an
> earlier xmca generation. Arne Raeithel and Alfred Lang
> led discussion on this topic as has, I believe, Jay Lemke. Alfred was
> steadfast in his interpretation of Vygotsky as a dualist in
> precisely the way that Andy did in a recent note. Its in the newsletter and
> the archives, or perhaps in Andy's computer.
>
> Given that as background,  what new insights can we gain from considering
> these early efforts at mutual enlightenment via computer *mediated*
> discourse??
>
> Could some of the core discussers organize to point us to prior
> understandings of this nexus of topics from the xmca/xlchc archives?
> That would provide a starting point for assessing the answer to my
> question. Otherwise, I fear we will be unable to supercede a collective
> level of discourse that corresponds more or less to chaining in a
> Vygotskian conceptual hierarchy.
>
> Summer Solstice Suggestion
>
> Mike
>