[Xmca-l] Re: Form, Function, and Hope

Larry Purss lpscholar2@gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 09:45:34 PST 2015


Robert,
Very helpful reminder of the notions "heteroprolepsis and autoprolepsi.
Also the metaphors of "buds" that are not yet "fruit.

Yes, we need to continually return to common metaphors and then translate
to other terms such as above.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Helena Worthen <helenaworthen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for this, Robert. Good collection of thoughts and references about
> prolepsis.
>
> H
>
> Helena Worthen
> helenaworthen@gmail.com
>
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Robert Lake wrote:
>
> > Hi again Everyone!
> > I recognize that most of what I write here is redundant and part of the
> > given history of XCMA, but I think we need to continually renew our
> > metalanguage by spelling out key concepts  for newcomers and of course
> our
> > own students. Otherwise we could end up like the prisoners on Alcatraz
> that
> > had been so long together that they knew all  knew each other's jokes, so
> > all they needed to say was "number 39 ha, ha ". "Well number 6 back to
> you".
> >
> > In terms of the praxis of hope and being within the zpd, I love Michael
> > Cole's (1996) notion of prolepsis which is predicated on  LSV's concept
> of
> > budding .Prolepsis is the perception of an anticipated or future
> condition
> > of development before it actually exists as an internalized state of
> being.
> > "The zone of proximal development defines those functions that have not
> yet
> > matured but are in the process of maturation, functions that will mature
> > tomorrow but are currently in an embryonic state. These functions could
> be
> > termed the “buds” or “flowers” of development rather than the “fruits” of
> > development.” (Vygotsky, 1978, p.86)" *So hope of further
> **development** is
> > based on present "being".* For example  at some point in life , probably
> > all of us were  told that we had real potential as a scholar or teacher .
> > Prolepsis is a rare and extremely valuable tool in education if teachers
> > and mentors can use it realistically as a means to help students move
> into
> > spaces that are truly within their grasp through interaction with those
> who
> > see can look at the bud and see the fruit until prolepsis becomes
> > internalized by the student themselves. Boris Meshcheryakov (2007) calls
> > this transition a process of moving from “heteroprolepsis” to
> > “autoprolepsis” (p.166).
> >
> > An example of each would be when a parent hears their child humming on
> key
> > or reproducing entire tunes in various levels of complexity, they will of
> > course, under normal conditions, encourage their offspring toward some
> > future musical activity by reporting their performance to them with
> > something like “when you were two, you could hum all the notes to that
> song
> > and I know you will do quite well with piano lessons”.Meshcheryakov goes
> on
> > to relate an example of autoprolepsis in children’s role playing when the
> > child imagines “him or herself in various adults’ roles (hunter, mother,
> > teacher, etc.), imitating the elements of cultural forms of behavior” (p.
> > 167). Many future and present teachers for example can recall a time when
> > they used to pretend teach their siblings or maybe even their stuffed
> > animals. But this role-play does not cease as we grow out of childhood.
> > Student teaching, apprenticeships, GA's  could all be zpd spaces with the
> > potential of  moving from heteroprolepsis to autoprolepsis.
> >
> >
> > Cole, M.,(1996). *Cultural psychology: A once and future* *discipline.*
> > Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
> >
> >
> > Meshcheryakov, B. G. (2007). Terminology in L. S. Vygotsky’s writings. In
> > Daniels, H., Cole, M., Wertsch, J. V. (Eds.)  *The Cambridge companion to
> > Vygotsky*. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
> >
> >
> > Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). *Mind in society*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
> University
> > Press.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Larry Purss <lpscholar2@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The theme [sense] of hope within an atmosphere [mood] of despair, dread,
> >> and cynicism has been referred to as "blues hope".
> >> The question of "being" in the present moment and only from this moment
> can
> >> we act is presented as a relation with blues hope.
> >> This "being" which sociocultural themes indicate "carries" form which
> >> develop in particular practices of creating "collectives".
> >> So where do we situate Bloch's notion of "hope" within these "forms" as
> >> cultural-historical embedded practices.
> >>
> >> Athanasios Marvakis answer [page 2] is:
> >>
> >> "The 'utopian' is not located - as a speculation - in a transcendent and
> >> separate realm else-where or else-when.  Utopianism AS future
> orientedness
> >> - is immanent in the present, and the issue IS [LP - being] to detect,
> >> recognize, and discern, rather than to criticise, the blurred and fuzzy
> >> MANIFESTATIONS of hope - AS the emotional energizing ground [LP - coming
> >> into form] of utopianism - that EXIST [LP - have their being] within
> >> everyday life."
> >>
> >> I would say this is one "theme" or sense that can be "generated" to
> >> Annalisa's question on only being in the present moment "exists"
> >>
> >> Larry
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Robert Lake  Ed.D.*Associate Professor
> > Social Foundations of Education
> > Dept. of Curriculum, Foundations, and Reading
> > Georgia Southern University
> > Secretary/Treasurer-AERA- Paulo Freire Special Interest Group
> > P. O. Box 8144
> > Phone: (912) 478-0355
> > Fax: (912) 478-5382
> > Statesboro, GA  30460
>
>
>


More information about the xmca-l mailing list