[Xmca-l] Re: Nate's new webpage on Vygotsky

[mike cole]

The comparison of the different forms of dialogicality IS interesting, Ed,
at least to me. At present I fear that the leading Bakhtinians among us
have moved on to other forums, so not sure who will be reading or is
interested.

I regretted their acceptance of the scaffolding metaphor. I really believe
it is misleading in important ways, as easily as it comes to mind
(including my own). But its one of those topics that while it has been
around for a long time (early 1980's at least, not long after Wood, Bruner,
et al started using the term), gets no traction.
mike

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Ed Wall <ewall@umich.edu> wrote:

> Thanks for this, Mike. The piece about Vygotsky and Bhaktin in regard to
> the ZPD is quite interesting. I'd be interested to hear comments  from the
> list.
>
> Ed
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at  1:16 PM, mike cole wrote:
>
> > Check it out!
> > mike
> >
> > http://webpages.charter.net/schmolze1/vygotsky/vygotsky.html
> >
> > --
> >
> > Development and Evolution are both ... "processes of construction and re-
> > construction in which heterogeneous resources are contingently but more
> or
> > less reliably reassembled for each life cycle." [Oyama, Griffiths, and
> > Gray, 2001]
>
>
>


-- 

Development and Evolution are both ... "processes of construction and re-
construction in which heterogeneous resources are contingently but more or
less reliably reassembled for each life cycle." [Oyama, Griffiths, and
Gray, 2001]