[Xmca-l] Re: Fwd: [Методология и история психологии] Uploaded What theory is not.pdf

[Huw Lloyd]

For me, the lack of theory and the lack of applying theory in social
science postgraduate courses is dumbfounding.  Most of the students and
staff I've met don't seem to mind however.

Though it seems like moving through the thickest of treacle to even state
this.... there is a need for such papers.

Best,
Huw



On 16 June 2014 21:46, Lubomir Savov Popov <lspopov@bgsu.edu> wrote:

> Just to add: In the professions, theoretical training is not very strong
> because the focus is on hands-on thinking. The article is evidently written
> for researchers in the professions rather than the sciences. At least, this
> is my perception.
>
> Lubomir
>
> Lubomir Popov, PhD
> School of Family and Consumer Sciences
> American Culture Studies Affiliated Faculty
> Bowling Green State University
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu [mailto:
> xmca-l-bounces@mailman.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Helena Worthen
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 4:05 PM
> To: eXtended Mind, Culture, Activity
> Subject: [Xmca-l] Re: Fwd: [Методология и история психологии] Uploaded
> What theory is not.pdf
>
> David --
>
> I wouldn't be so severe as to say that you're being compulsively cynical,
> but I would say that your comments are a bit on the tough side.
>
> This article (which is showing up on my subject line in Cyrillic) is one
> of those  code-breakers that may seem unnecessary to those for whom the
> information is obvious, but it essential for those who haven't run into
> anyone who could step aside for a moment and pass along the key secrets. It
> reminds me of a message sent out on XMCA about 20 years ago -- is that
> possible? -- by Chris Argyris about how to behave with ones colleagues on
> email. These are things that if no one says them out loud, they are
> expensive to learn through trial and error.
>
>
> Helena Worthen
> hworthen@illinois.edu
> helenaworthen@gmail.com
>
> On Jun 15, 2014, at 1:31 AM, David Kellogg wrote:
>
> > Mike:
> >
> > This article struck me as theoretically naive. First of all, the whole
> > idea of articles without theory is a little silly, particularly for
> > anybody who has taken Chapter Two of Thinking and Speech and
> > Vygotsky's critique of Piaget's atheoretism on board. Secondly, the
> > idea that "why" questions and a focus on causality is a hallmark of
> > theory essentially writes off the whole of Dilthey, descriptivism,
> > structuralism and post-structuralism. You might not agree with this
> > line of thought and body of work, but to deny it status as theory seems
> pointless.
> >
> > I must admit, though, the whole genre of editors and reviewers who
> > repackage as articles their complaints about having to review articles
> > by professors who are desperate to publish is rather puzzling to me.
> > There are plenty of other channels for this sort of thing, e.g.
> > reviews, pub discussions, and even xmca. But perhaps they too  are
> desperate to publish.
> > Or am I being compulsively cynical?
> >
> > David Kellogg
> > Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15 June 2014 02:13, mike cole <lchcmike@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I recommend this paper on what theory is not. It touches on a number
> >> of issues that we encounter a good deal in reviewing manuscripts sent
> to MCA.
> >> I am forwarding from
> >> Ilya Garber's discussion group with thanks to Ilya for posting.
> >> mike
> >>
> >>
> >>  Ilya Garber posted in Методология и история психологии <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/n/?groups%2F505367082848886%2F77643948574164
> >> 3%2F&aref=354957658&medium=email&mid=a067d84G3212ac93G1528395aG96Gba2
> >> 4&bcode=1.1402765399.AblhaHTp27u9ny_P&n_m=lchcmike%40gmail.com
> >>>
> >> [image: Ilya Garber]
> >> <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=1202221848&aref=354957658&
> >> medium=email&mid=a067d84G3212ac93G1528395aG96Gba24&bcode=1.1402765399
> >> .AblhaHTp27u9ny_P&n_m=lchcmike%40gmail.com
> >>>
> >> Ilya
> >> Garber
> >> <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=1202221848&aref=354957658&
> >> medium=email&mid=a067d84G3212ac93G1528395aG96Gba24&bcode=1.1402765399
> >> .AblhaHTp27u9ny_P&n_m=lchcmike%40gmail.com
> >>>
> >> 10:02am
> >> Jun 14
> >> Практически в каждой журнальной статье по психологии есть
> >> теоретический раздел. Два опытных и умных редактора объяснили, что не
> является теорией.
> >> Must read.
> >> What theory is not.pdf
> >> <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/download/682318241852537/What%20theory%20is%
> >> 20not.pdf
> >>>
> >>
> >> View Post on Facebook
> >> <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/n/?groups%2F505367082848886%2F77643948574164
> >> 3%2F&aref=354957658&medium=email&mid=a067d84G3212ac93G1528395aG96Gba2
> >> 4&bcode=1.1402765399.AblhaHTp27u9ny_P&n_m=lchcmike%40gmail.com
> >>>
> >> · Edit Email Settings
> >> <
> >> https://www.facebook.com/n/?settings&tab=notifications&section=group_
> >> notification&aref=354957658&medium=email&mid=a067d84G3212ac93G1528395
> >> aG96Gba24&bcode=1.1402765399.AblhaHTp27u9ny_P&n_m=lchcmike%40gmail.co
> >> m
> >>>
> >> · Reply to this email to add a comment.
> >>
>
>
>
>